These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6691133)

  • 1. NIH to review policy of DNA committee.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1984 Jan; 223(4631):35. PubMed ID: 6691133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Watch on human experiments.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1984 Feb 16-22; 307(5952):584. PubMed ID: 6694746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Panel backs research blocked by court.
    Norman C
    Science; 1984 Jun; 224(4654):1218. PubMed ID: 6587565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US genetic regulations: bacterial field trial to go ahead.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1984 Jun 7-13; 309(5968):483. PubMed ID: 6587190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Despite doubts RAC moving to widen role.
    Fox JL
    Science; 1984 Feb; 223(4638):798-9. PubMed ID: 6695181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RAC's review of gene therapy: it's time to move on.
    Post LE
    Hum Gene Ther; 1994 Nov; 5(11):1311-2; discussion 1313-4. PubMed ID: 7893802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic engineering: picking up the pieces.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1984 May 31-Jun 6; 309(5967):391. PubMed ID: 6587189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic engineering: regulation issue is resurrected by EPA.
    Budiansky S
    Nature; 1983 Aug; 304(5927):572. PubMed ID: 11653487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Petition to amend the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules to establish a Public Policy Advisory Committee. Foundation on Economic Trends, September 18, 1990.
    Hum Gene Ther; 1991; 2(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 1911933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judge halts gene-splicing experiment.
    Norman C
    Science; 1984 Jun; 224(4652):962-3. PubMed ID: 6719128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New biotech review board planned.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1985 Aug; 229(4715):736-7. PubMed ID: 3860953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH/FDA dispute likely to delay research.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1985 Aug 15-21; 316(6029):567. PubMed ID: 4033753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biotechnology's regulatory tangle.
    Sun M
    Science; 1984 Aug; 225(4663):697-8. PubMed ID: 6589780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
    Wilson DJ
    Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biotechnology: new plans for regulation.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1985 Oct; 317(6036):373. PubMed ID: 11653653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of the Recombinant Advisory Committee.
    Johnson IS
    Science; 1984 Apr; 224(4646):243. PubMed ID: 6710142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RAC approves accelerated review!
    Anderson WF
    Hum Gene Ther; 1994 Jun; 5(6):665-6. PubMed ID: 7948128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recombinant DNA committee.
    Ahmed AK
    Science; 1984 Feb; 223(4635):440. PubMed ID: 6691155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetic pesticides: Monsanto goes ahead with trials.
    Beardsley T
    Nature; 1984 Dec 20-27; 312(5996):686. PubMed ID: 11653606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Varmus proposes to scrap the RAC.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1996 May; 272(5264):945. PubMed ID: 8638134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.