BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6691380)

  • 1. Antepartum fetal heart rate response to sound stimulation: the acoustic stimulation test.
    Serafini P; Lindsay MB; Nagey DA; Pupkin MJ; Tseng P; Crenshaw C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Jan; 148(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 6691380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. III. Association of meconium with abnormal fetal heart rate patterns.
    Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Jordaan HV; Segreti A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(8):936-43. PubMed ID: 7405991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accelerations in "intra-partum" cardiotocographic record. III. Correlation with meconium staining of amniotic fluid.
    Stefanoni S; Radice E; Luerti M
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 1981; 8(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 7307269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Platt LD; Broussard P; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 155(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 3524234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Nonstress test, contraction stress test, and biophysical profile.
    Babbitt NE
    S D J Med; 1996 Nov; 49(11):403-8. PubMed ID: 8973133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Human placental lactogen levels and intrapartum fetal distress: meconium-stained amniotic fluid, fetal heart rate patterns, and Apgar scores.
    Spellacy WN; Buhi WC; Birk SA; Holsinger KK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1972 Nov; 114(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 4659537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antepartum nonstress fetal heart rate monitoring: systematic analysis of baseline patterns and decelerations as an adjunct to reactivity in the prediction of fetal risks.
    Brioschi PA; Extermann P; Terracina D; Weil C; Mao WT; Beguin F
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):633-7. PubMed ID: 4061531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal monitoring in high-risk pregnancy.
    McCrann DJ; Schifrin BS
    Clin Perinatol; 1974 Sep; 1(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 4470056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Antepartum fetal assessment using a fetal biophysical profile score.
    Baskett TF; Gray JH; Prewett SJ; Young LM; Allen AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 148(5):630-3. PubMed ID: 6702929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Management of prolonged pregnancy: results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Knox GE; Huddleston JF; Flowers CE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Jun; 134(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 453272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antepartum surveillance in diabetic pregnancies: predictors of fetal distress in labor.
    Kjos SL; Leung A; Henry OA; Victor MR; Paul RH; Medearis AL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1532-9. PubMed ID: 7503197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation of fetal heart rate decelerations following acoustic stimulation with perinatal outcome.
    Dunston-Boone G; Kuhlman K; Kaufmann M
    Am J Perinatol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 8540939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The fetal biophysical profile and its predictive value.
    Vintzileos AM; Campbell WA; Ingardia CJ; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 62(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 6877682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variable decelerations in reactive nonstress tests with decreased amniotic fluid index predict fetal compromise.
    Hoskins IA; Frieden FJ; Young BK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Oct; 165(4 Pt 1):1094-8. PubMed ID: 1951521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and amniotic fluid volume assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal death.
    Clark SL; Sabey P; Jolley K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Mar; 160(3):694-7. PubMed ID: 2929695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between meconium-stained amniotic fluid and changes in fetal heart rate.
    Mansi ML
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1979 Mar; 78(7):475-8. PubMed ID: 85619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The four-quadrant assessment of amniotic fluid volume: an adjunct to antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Rutherford SE; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Jacobs N
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):353-6. PubMed ID: 3306497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perinatal outcome and amniotic fluid index in the antepartum and intrapartum periods: A meta-analysis.
    Chauhan SP; Sanderson M; Hendrix NW; Magann EF; Devoe LD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 181(6):1473-8. PubMed ID: 10601931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perinatal outcome in the absence of antepartum fetal heart rate acceleration.
    Leveno KJ; Williams ML; DePalma RT; Whalley PJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Mar; 61(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 6823377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.