These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 669215)

  • 1. Transmural electrical potential difference in the mammalian esophagus in vivo.
    Turner KS; Powell DW; Carney CN; Orlando RC; Bozymski EM
    Gastroenterology; 1978 Aug; 75(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 669215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrical parameters and ion species for active transport in human esophageal stratified squamous epithelium and Barrett's specialized columnar epithelium.
    Tobey NA; Argote CM; Vanegas XC; Barlow W; Orlando RC
    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2007 Jul; 293(1):G264-70. PubMed ID: 17431220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Esophageal potential difference measurements in esophageal disease.
    Orlando RC; Powell DW; Bryson JC; Kinard HB; Carney CN; Jones JD; Bozymski EM
    Gastroenterology; 1982 Nov; 83(5):1026-32. PubMed ID: 7117784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Barrett's esophagus: clinical, endoscopic, histologic, manometric, and electrical potential difference characteristics.
    Herlihy KJ; Orlando RC; Bryson JC; Bozymski EM; Carney CN; Powell DW
    Gastroenterology; 1984 Mar; 86(3):436-43. PubMed ID: 6693010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Esophageal manometry in the opossum.
    Schulze K; Dodds WJ; Christensen J; Wood JD
    Am J Physiol; 1977 Sep; 233(3):E152-9. PubMed ID: 910901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.
    Blonski W; Hila A; Vela MF; Castell DO
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Aug; 42(7):776-81. PubMed ID: 18360293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of in vivo measurement of transesophageal electrical resistance as an indicator of early experimental esophageal mucosal injury.
    Kidder GW; Lillemoe KD; Harmon JW; Maydonovitch CL; Bunte RM; Johnson LF
    J Lab Clin Med; 1983 Oct; 102(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 6619646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in cytochrome c oxidase capacity in smooth muscle of opossum esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter.
    Robison BA; Percy WH; Christensen J
    Gastroenterology; 1984 Nov; 87(5):1009-13. PubMed ID: 6090254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences between esophageal body and lower esophageal sphincter in mitochondria of smooth muscle in opossum.
    Christensen J; Roberts RL
    Gastroenterology; 1983 Sep; 85(3):650-6. PubMed ID: 6873611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transmucosal potential difference as an index of esophageal mucosal integrity.
    Scarpignato C; Micali B; Galmiche JP
    Digestion; 1995; 56 Suppl 1():51-60. PubMed ID: 7556972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stepwise radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's esophagus preserves esophageal inner diameter, compliance, and motility.
    Beaumont H; Gondrie JJ; McMahon BP; Pouw RE; Gregersen H; Bergman JJ; Boeckxstaens GE
    Endoscopy; 2009 Jan; 41(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 19160152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esophageal manometry in horses, cows, and sheep during deglutition.
    Clark ES; Morris DD; Whitlock RH
    Am J Vet Res; 1987 Apr; 48(4):547-51. PubMed ID: 3592352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Membrane potential and mechanical responses of the opossum esophagus to vagal stimulation and swallowing.
    Rattan S; Gidda JS; Goyal RK
    Gastroenterology; 1983 Oct; 85(4):922-8. PubMed ID: 6884715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The mechanics of esophageal muscle contraction. Evidence of an inotropic effect of gastrin.
    Cohen S; Green F
    J Clin Invest; 1973 Aug; 52(8):2029-40. PubMed ID: 4719676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study of esophageal function by standard esophageal manometry in 72 healthy volunteers. Proposal for national reference values. Spanish Group for the Study of Digestive Motility.
    Mínguez M
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1998 Sep; 90(9):613-24. PubMed ID: 9780798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between pressure wave amplitude and esophageal bolus clearance assessed by combined manometry and multichannel intraluminal impedance measurement.
    Nguyen NQ; Tippett M; Smout AJ; Holloway RH
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Nov; 101(11):2476-84. PubMed ID: 17029613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of severity of gastroesophageal reflux disease with gastric acid secretory profile and esophageal acid exposure during nocturnal acid breakthrough: a study using 24-h dual-channel pH-metry.
    Ghoshal UC; Chourasia D; Tripathi S; Misra A; Singh K
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2008; 43(6):654-61. PubMed ID: 18569981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lower sphincter of the opossum esophagus in pseudopregnancy.
    Schulze K; Christensen J
    Gastroenterology; 1977 Nov; 73(5):1082-5. PubMed ID: 908487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel ultrasound technique to study the biomechanics of the human esophagus in vivo.
    Takeda T; Kassab G; Liu J; Puckett JL; Mittal RR; Mittal RK
    Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol; 2002 May; 282(5):G785-93. PubMed ID: 11960775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of dopamine on the esophageal smooth muscle in vivo.
    Rattan S; Goyal RK
    Gastroenterology; 1976 Mar; 70(3):377-81. PubMed ID: 942933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.