These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6693620)
1. Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vivo hydrodynamic characteristics. Gray RJ; Chaux A; Matloff JM; DeRobertis M; Raymond M; Stewart M; Yoganathan A J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 3(2 Pt 1):321-7. PubMed ID: 6693620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics. Yoganathan AP; Chaux A; Gray RJ; Woo YR; DeRobertis M; Williams FP; Matloff JM J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Feb; 3(2 Pt 1):313-20. PubMed ID: 6693619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Doppler echocardiography in assessing mechanical and biological heart valve prostheses]. Minardi G; Di Segni M; Boccardi L; Ferrari O; Giovannini E G Ital Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 3410201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: an in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves. Baumgartner H; Khan S; DeRobertis M; Czer L; Maurer G J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Feb; 19(2):324-32. PubMed ID: 1531058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves. Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advances in prosthetic heart valves: fluid mechanics of aortic valve designs. Yoganathan AP; Woo YR; Sung HW; Jones M J Biomater Appl; 1988 Apr; 2(4):579-614. PubMed ID: 2974076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position]. Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. Panidis IP; Ross J; Mintz GS J Am Coll Cardiol; 1986 Aug; 8(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 2942593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Velocity fields and turbulent stresses downstream of biological and mechanical aortic valve prostheses implanted in pigs. Hasenkam JM; Pedersen EM; Ostergaard JH; Nygaard H; Paulsen PK; Johannsen G; Schurizek BA Cardiovasc Res; 1988 Jul; 22(7):472-83. PubMed ID: 3252971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. Kleine P; Scherer M; Abdel-Rahman U; Klesius AA; Ackermann H; Moritz A J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2002 Nov; 124(5):925-32. PubMed ID: 12407375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hemodynamic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in the small aortic anulus. Wortham DC; Tri TB; Bowen TE J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Apr; 81(4):615-20. PubMed ID: 7206770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An emergency physician's guide to prosthetic heart valves: identification and hemodynamic function. Harrison EC; Rashtian MY; Allen DT; Yoganathan AP; Rahimtoola SH Ann Emerg Med; 1988 Mar; 17(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 3345013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position. Jaffe WM; Coverdale HA; Roche AH; Whitlock RM; Neutze JM; Barratt-Boyes BG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Aug; 100(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 2385114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: an in vivo and in vitro study. Bech-Hanssen O; Caidahl K; Wallentin I; Ask P; Wranne B J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):287-95. PubMed ID: 11479501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic and hemolytic features of the St. Jude Medical valve prostheses. Sezai Y; Umeda S; Okazaki T; Okamoto I; Rikukawa H; Shiono M J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1984; 25(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 6707068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of the new mechanical bileaflet Sorin Bicarbon valve prosthesis compared with St. Jude Medical]. Badano L; Carratino L; De Gaetano G; Piazza R; Calisi P; Passerone G; Lucatti A G Ital Cardiol; 1994 Jun; 24(6):733-43. PubMed ID: 8088472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro comparison of bileaflet aortic heart valve prostheses. St. Jude Medical, CarboMedics, modified Edwards-Duromedics, and Sorin-Bicarbon valves. Reul H; van Son JA; Steinseifer U; Schmitz B; Schmidt A; Schmitz C; Rau G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Sep; 106(3):412-20. PubMed ID: 8361181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves. Williams GA; Labovitz AJ Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemodynamics of St. Jude Medical prostheses in the small aortic root: in vivo studies using dobutamine Doppler echocardiography. Kadir I; Izzat MB; Birdi I; Wilde P; Reeves B; Bryan AJ; Angelini GD J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 9130118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses. Walker PG; Yoganathan AP Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]