99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6694574)
1. Medifraud.
Blewett N
Med J Aust; 1984 Jan; 140(2):117-8. PubMed ID: 6694574
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ruling influences HMO valuations, reimbursement.
Traska MR
Hospitals; 1988 Jun; 62(11):47-8. PubMed ID: 3131232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medifraud and overservicing.
Med J Aust; 1984 Sep; 141(6):397-8. PubMed ID: 6503833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud in a Harvard lab.
Wallis C
Time; 1983 Feb; 121(9):49. PubMed ID: 10258152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Code of conduct: your shield against fraud and abuse.
Brocklesby G
Tenn Med; 2007 Dec; 100(12):26-7. PubMed ID: 18183850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Risk management: physician practice acquisition under the anti-kickback law.
Hetzel JV; Nagle TB
Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1995; 10(3):57-60; quiz 61-2. PubMed ID: 7492879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Welcome to LA.
Brass A
Br J Hosp Med; 1978 Mar; 19(3):278. PubMed ID: 630171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to succeed in practice by really trying.
Assef A
Aust Fam Physician; 1982 Dec; 11(12):954-6. PubMed ID: 7159285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The crime and punishment of cheating in medical school.
Cockayne TW; Samuelson CO
Proc Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1983; 22():166-71. PubMed ID: 6564855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory kickbacks to doctors persist despite federal and state investigations.
Schorr B
Wall St J Midwest Ed; 1978 Sep; 58(241):40. PubMed ID: 10238424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Aversion of doctors to the subject of marketing].
Baruch M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Apr; 218(4):A74-5. PubMed ID: 11392276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Compensation claims in defiance of invalid insurance claims?].
Riemer M
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2006 May; 131(20):1178. PubMed ID: 16705543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Australian fraud inquiry under way.
Morgan C
Nature; 1988 Jul; 334(6178):96. PubMed ID: 3386761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Preventing and dealing with scientific fraud in Australia.
Olson LG
Med J Aust; 1989 Aug; 151(3):173-4. PubMed ID: 2755379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. H.R. 5198: the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act: implications for providers.
Gamble VN
J Ambul Care Manage; 1989 May; 12(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 10303463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stark's crusade: the Ethics in Patient Referrals Act of 1989.
Morse RA; Popovits RM
J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Jul; 22(7):208-16, 224. PubMed ID: 10304214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the law to diminish temptation. Thoughts on the Stark Bill.
Holland RA
Adm Radiol; 1989 Feb; 8(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 10292732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific fraud and scientific ethics.
Weinstein D
Conn Med; 1981 Oct; 45(10):655-8. PubMed ID: 7307510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Physician fraud--civil and criminal implications.
Schwartz VL
Pa Med; 1977 Jan; 80(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 834447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conflicts of interest with the health industry.
Dubois MY
Pain Med; 2006; 7(5):463-5. PubMed ID: 17014609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
