These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6694747)
1. An old illusion and a new theory of stereoscopic depth perception. Frisby JP Nature; 1984 Feb 16-22; 307(5952):592-3. PubMed ID: 6694747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The plasticity of correspondence: after-effects, illusions and horopter shifts in depth perception. Nelson JI J Theor Biol; 1977 May; 66(2):203-66. PubMed ID: 886865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A stereoscopic presentation of the Hermann Grid. Troscianko T Vision Res; 1982; 22(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 7112948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The moon illusion: a test of the vestibular hypothesis under monocular viewing conditions. Carter DS Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1127-30. PubMed ID: 305029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cyclopean stimulation can influence sensations of self-motion in normal and stereoblind subjects. Wolfe JM; Held R Percept Psychophys; 1980 Aug; 28(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 7432987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Rogers BJ; Graham ME Science; 1983 Sep; 221(4618):1409-11. PubMed ID: 6612351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Pulfrich phenomenon with eye movement. Ono H; Steinbach MJ Vision Res; 1983; 23(12):1735-7. PubMed ID: 6666079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stroboscopic motion in depth. Finlay D Perception; 1982; 11(6):733-41. PubMed ID: 7186624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Resolving discrepant results of the Wheatstone experiment. Ono H; Wade NJ Psychol Res; 1985; 47(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 3903820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The moon illusion revisited. Iavecchia JH; Iavecchia HP; Roscoe SN Aviat Space Environ Med; 1983 Jan; 54(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6830556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereoacuity testing: an illusion of tilt when viewing two parallel vertical rods or lines. Larson WL; Gresset J; Bolduc M; Thibault L Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Aug; 65(8):632-6. PubMed ID: 3177588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photopic visual phantom illusion: its common and unique characteristics as a completion effect. Kitaoka A; Gyoba J; Kawabata H Perception; 1999; 28(7):825-34. PubMed ID: 10664775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory. Gillam B; Lawergren B Percept Psychophys; 1983 Aug; 34(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 6634367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The double-nail illusion: experiments on binocular vision with nails, needles, and pins. Krol JD; van de Grind WA Perception; 1980; 9(6):651-69. PubMed ID: 7220239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Moon Illusion as (Partly) an Error in Apparent Visual Angle: A New Possibility. Parks TE Perception; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1153-1156. PubMed ID: 31423942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Binocular vergence influences the assignment of stereo correspondences. Mallot HA; Bideau H Vision Res; 1990; 30(10):1521-3. PubMed ID: 2247962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]