These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6695077)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Work in progress.
    El Yousef SJ; Duchesneau RH; Alfidi RJ; Haaga JR; Bryan PJ; LiPuma JP
    Radiology; 1984 Mar; 150(3):761-6. PubMed ID: 6695077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benign and malignant breast disease: magnetic resonance and radiofrequency pulse sequences.
    el Yousef SJ; O'Connell DM; Duchesneau RH; Smith MJ; Hubay CA; Guyton SP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jul; 145(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 2988320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial experience with nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging of the human breast.
    El Yousef SJ; Alfidi RJ; Duchesneau RH; Hubay CA; Haaga JR; Bryan PJ; LiPuma JP; Ament AE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1983 Apr; 7(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 6300203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast disease.
    Dash N; Lupetin AR; Daffner RH; Deeb ZL; Sefczek RJ; Schapiro RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jan; 146(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 3484399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
    Gökalp G; Topal U
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carcinoma of the breast: detection with MR imaging versus xeromammography.
    Turner DA; Alcorn FS; Shorey WD; Stelling CB; Mategrano VC; Merten CW; Silver B; Economou SG; Straus AK; Witt TR
    Radiology; 1988 Jul; 168(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 3289095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast imaging: pitfalls, controversies, and some practical thoughts.
    Homer MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Sep; 23(3):459-72. PubMed ID: 3903842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of ultrasound in a breast imaging center.
    Feig SA
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 1989 Apr; 10(2):90-105. PubMed ID: 2697335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [MR mammography at 0.5 tesla. I. Comparison of image quality and sensitivity of MR mammography at 0.5 and 1.5 T].
    Kuhl CK; Kreft BP; Hauswirth A; Elevelt A; Steudel A; Reiser M; Schild HH
    Rofo; 1995 May; 162(5):381-9. PubMed ID: 7772759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human breast: a Phase I trial.
    El Yousef SJ; Duchesneau RH
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1984 Dec; 22(4):859-68. PubMed ID: 6096921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automated breast sonography using a 7.5-MHz PVDF transducer: preliminary clinical evaluation. Work in progress.
    Jackson VP; Kelly-Fry E; Rothschild PA; Holden RW; Clark SA
    Radiology; 1986 Jun; 159(3):679-84. PubMed ID: 3517952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram.
    Lee CH; Smith RC; Levine JA; Troiano RN; Tocino I
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 10541112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ultrasonic mammographic parenchymal patterns: a preliminary report.
    Rubin CS; Kurtz AB; Goldberg BB; Feig S; Cole-Beuglet C
    Radiology; 1979 Feb; 130(2):515-7. PubMed ID: 760171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of ductal obstruction sign in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions at MR imaging.
    Baltzer PA; Kaiser CG; Dietzel M; Vag T; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):e18-21. PubMed ID: 19954911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [MR-mammography: current status and perspectives].
    Funke M; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1996 May; 6(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8679736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computed tomographic evaluation of the breast.
    Chang CH; Sibala JL; Fritz SL; Gallagher JH; Dwyer SJ; Templeton AW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Sep; 131(3):459-64. PubMed ID: 98990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [MR tomography of the breast. Supplemental information in select cases].
    Friedrich M; Semmler W
    Radiologe; 1987 Apr; 27(4):165-77. PubMed ID: 3299481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benign and malignant breast lesions: diagnosis with multiparametric MR imaging.
    Jacobs MA; Barker PB; Bluemke DA; Maranto C; Arnold C; Herskovits EH; Bhujwalla Z
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 14519877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: functional T1 and three-dimensional imaging.
    Partain CL; Kulkarni MV; Price RR; Fleischer AC; Page DL; Malcolm AW; Winfield AC; James AE
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1986; 8(5-6):292-9. PubMed ID: 3084093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR ductography: comparison with conventional ductography as a diagnostic method in patients with nipple discharge.
    Hirose M; Nobusawa H; Gokan T
    Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S183-96. PubMed ID: 18180226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.