These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6695479)

  • 1. Success with penile prosthesis from patient's viewpoint.
    Hollander JB; Diokno AC
    Urology; 1984 Feb; 23(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 6695479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experience with penile prostheses in the treatment of impotence in diabetic men.
    Beaser RS; Van der Hoek C; Jacobson AM; Flood TM; Desautels RE
    JAMA; 1982 Aug; 248(8):943-8. PubMed ID: 7097962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reactions to the implantation of an inflatable penile prosthesis among psychogenically and organically impotent men.
    Schlamowitz KE; Beutler LE; Scott FB; Karacan I; Ware C
    J Urol; 1983 Feb; 129(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 6834493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Inflatable penile prosthesis: follow-up study of patient-partner satisfaction.
    Gerstenberger DL; Osborne D; Furlow WL
    Urology; 1979 Dec; 14(6):583-7. PubMed ID: 516212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attitudes of diabetic men after implantation of a semi-rigid penile prosthesis.
    Peterson HR; Best JD; Berger R; Reenan A; Porte D; Halter JB; Pfeifer MA
    Diabetes Care; 1985; 8(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 3996173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Penile Prosthesis First and Replacement Surgeries: Analysis of Patient and Partner Satisfaction.
    Lledó-García E; Jara-Rascón J; Moncada Iribarren I; Piñero-Sánchez J; Aragón-Chamizo J; Hernández-Fernández C
    J Sex Med; 2015 Jul; 12(7):1646-53. PubMed ID: 26193766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of patients and partners 1 to 4 years after penile prosthesis surgery.
    Pedersen B; Tiefer L; Ruiz M; Melman A
    J Urol; 1988 May; 139(5):956-8. PubMed ID: 3361673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical experience with hinged silicone penile implants for impotence.
    Barry JM
    J Urol; 1980 Feb; 123(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 7354511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of Life, Psychological Functioning, and Treatment Satisfaction of Men Who Have Undergone Penile Prosthesis Surgery Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Pillay B; Moon D; Love C; Meyer D; Ferguson E; Crowe H; Howard N; Mann S; Wootten A
    J Sex Med; 2017 Dec; 14(12):1612-1620. PubMed ID: 29111200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surgical treatment of erectile impotence with inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Malloy TR; Voneschenbach AC
    J Urol; 1977 Jul; 118(1 Pt 1):49-51. PubMed ID: 875198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inflatable penile prosthesis: Mayo Clinic experience with 175 patients.
    Furlow WL
    Urology; 1979 Feb; 13(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 433026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the Small-Carrion and Scott-Bradley penile prostheses.
    Smith AD; Lange PH; Fraley EE
    J Urol; 1979 May; 121(5):609-11. PubMed ID: 439256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why Are Men Satisfied or Dissatisfied with Penile Implants? A Mixed Method Study on Satisfaction with Penile Prosthesis Implantation.
    Carvalheira A; Santana R; Pereira NM
    J Sex Med; 2015 Dec; 12(12):2474-80. PubMed ID: 26639576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inflatable and noninflatable penile prostheses: comparative follow-up evaluation.
    Beutler LE; Scott FB; Rogers RR; Karacan I; Baer PE; Gaines JA
    Urology; 1986 Feb; 27(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 3946036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis (QoLSPP): to what extent does the implant affect the patient's life?
    Caraceni E; Utizi L
    J Sex Med; 2014 Apr; 11(4):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 24548771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The failed penile prosthetic implantation despite technical success.
    Krauss DJ; Bogin D; Culebras A
    J Urol; 1983 May; 129(5):969-71. PubMed ID: 6854772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inflatable penile prosthesis. New device design and patient-partner satisfaction.
    Furlow WL; Barrett DM
    Urology; 1984 Dec; 24(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 6506395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prostheses implantation correlates with female partner satisfaction.
    Vakalopoulos I; Kampantais S; Ioannidis S; Laskaridis L; Dimopoulos P; Toutziaris C; Koptsis M; Henry GD; Katsikas V
    J Sex Med; 2013 Nov; 10(11):2774-81. PubMed ID: 24034543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semirigid and malleable rod penile prostheses.
    Nielsen KT; Bruskewitz RC
    Urol Clin North Am; 1989 Feb; 16(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 2916270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The current status of the inflatable penile prosthesis in the management of impotence: Mayo Clinic experience updated.
    Furlow WL
    J Urol; 1978 Mar; 119(3):363-4. PubMed ID: 642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.