77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 669930)
1. After Saikewicz: No-fault death.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Jun; 8(3):16-8. PubMed ID: 669930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. After Quinlan: the impact of the Saikewicz decision.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1979 Jul; 43(7):455. PubMed ID: 477310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Assuring "detached but passionate investigation and decision": the role of guardians ad litem in Saikewicz-type cases.
Baron CH
Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(2):111-30. PubMed ID: 707492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Judges at the bedside: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 10289106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. In the matter of the treatment and care of Infant Doe. Declaratory judgment. Circuit Court for the County of Monroe, State of Indiana.
Conn Med; 1983 Jul; 47(7):409-10. PubMed ID: 6224632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The law and death--an overview.
Stephan LD; Billings MN
J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 11662357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Decisions not to treat: the Saikewicz case and its aftermath.
Glantz LH; Swazey JP
Bull Am Coll Physicians; 1979 Jan; 2(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 11661768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Birth-defective infants: a standard for nontreatment decisions.
MacMillan ES
Stanford Law Rev; 1978 Feb; 30(3):599-633. PubMed ID: 10306127
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Saikewicz: nontreatment decisions for incompetents.
Gamble HF
Linacre Q; 1983 Aug; 50(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 11655586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re D.H.
Di Somma AV
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(3):403. PubMed ID: 11644339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Further reflections on the Saikewicz decision.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1979 Aug; 43(8):527. PubMed ID: 553780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Natural death: an alternative in New Jersey.
Levant S
Georgetown Law J; 1985 Jun; 73(5):1331-54. PubMed ID: 11651811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When the neonate is defective.
Contemp Ob Gyn; 1976 Jun; 7(6):90-92+. PubMed ID: 11663000
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Last rights: an analysis of refusal and withholding of treatment cases.
Brant J
Miss Law Rev; 1981; 46(2):337-70. PubMed ID: 11651657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right to die.
Kirven G
Ky Bench Bar; 1975 Jul; 39(3):16+. PubMed ID: 11664754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Termination of life support systems in the elderly. Discussion: To die before the gods please: legal issues surrounding euthanasia and the elderly.
Baron CH
J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1981; 14(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 7343584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Discontinuing nutrition support: a review of the case law.
Dresser R
J Am Diet Assoc; 1985 Oct; 85(10):1289-92. PubMed ID: 3930592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The lessons of Quinlan.
Drane JF
Health Prog; 1986; 67(6):19-23. PubMed ID: 10277355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The courts and the practice of medicine.
Trout ME
J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Oct; 4(9):2. PubMed ID: 1085803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The case of Earle Spring: terminating treatment on the senile.
Glantz LH
Medicoleg News; 1980 Sep; 8(4):14, 27. PubMed ID: 10317012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
