These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 669930)
41. Evolving Delaware law on the termination of life-sustaining treatment. Hayman S Del Med J; 1987 Mar; 59(3):205-8, 213-4. PubMed ID: 3569614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case. Baumgardner KL Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die. Glick HR West Polit Q; 1992; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: who decides and on what criteria? Longino PH Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):377-407. PubMed ID: 11658479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Determination of death legislation. Robinson RC Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 11650610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Termination of life support in vegetative states: New York court sets guidelines for private decisions. Beresford HR Ann Neurol; 1982 Jan; 11(1):103-4. PubMed ID: 7059124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Saikewicz-ophobia: is it justified? Gibbs RF Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jul; 6(7):4. PubMed ID: 682822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The Saikewicz decision: a medical viewpoint. Relman AS Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 736045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Defective children, their parents, and the death decision. Nolan-Haley JM J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Jan; 4(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 1082475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Death, dying, and the courts: the travesty and tragedy of the Earle Spring case. Paris JJ Linacre Q; 1982 Feb; 49(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 11650518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Disabled infant's parents win again. Krieger L Am Med News; 1984 Mar; 27(10):2, 28. PubMed ID: 11653558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails. Curran M Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Voluntary euthanasia: a proposed remedy. Cole SS; Shea MS Albany Law Rev; 1975; 39(4):826-56. PubMed ID: 11661204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The 'No Code Blue' issue: Missouri is not Massachusetts. Lampton LM; Winship DH Mo Med; 1979 May; 76(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 440267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Vox clamantis in deserto: do you really mean what you say in Spring? Dunn LJ; Ator NE Medicoleg News; 1981 Feb; 9(1):14-6, 27. PubMed ID: 10317079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. A "life" no longer supported. Lancet; 1993 Feb; 341(8842):410. PubMed ID: 8094175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The Leicester case. Cordner SM Med J Aust; 1982 Apr; 1(7):313-4. PubMed ID: 6211597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Position paper on "withholding treatment". Kushner W Can Psychiatr Assoc J; 1979 Jun; 24(4):375-6. PubMed ID: 466633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Position paper on "withholding treatment". Tibbles JA Can Psychiatr Assoc J; 1979 Jun; 24(4):376. PubMed ID: 157221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]