BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6700289)

  • 1. Comparative aspects of medical practice. Organizational setting and financial arrangements in four delivery systems.
    Goodman LJ; Swartwout JE
    Med Care; 1984 Mar; 22(3):255-67. PubMed ID: 6700289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Some notes on the development of an IPA model HMO.
    Savitz SA; Roberts PR
    J Ambul Care Manage; 1986 May; 9(2):33-53. PubMed ID: 10275918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.
    Rubin HR; Gandek B; Rogers WH; Kosinski M; McHorney CA; Ware JE
    JAMA; 1993 Aug; 270(7):835-40. PubMed ID: 8340982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should fee-for-service group practices develop a prepaid component?
    Shouldice RG
    Med Group Manage; 1981; 28(1):54, 58-9. PubMed ID: 10250275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Better off alone? Why physicians don't merge.
    Bauman RR
    J Med Pract Manage; 2007; 23(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 17974081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary care performance in fee-for-service and prepaid health care systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.
    Safran DG; Tarlov AR; Rogers WH
    JAMA; 1994 May; 271(20):1579-86. PubMed ID: 8182810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prepaid plans re-established in a fee-for-service group.
    Hillmer HA
    Med Group Manage; 1983; 30(6):18-22, 30. PubMed ID: 10264806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An IPA organizer tells why and how.
    Tobin JJ
    Patient Care; 1981 Mar; 15(5):182-5, 188, 190 passim. PubMed ID: 10250351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of prepaid medicine on the fee-for-service practice.
    Nelson RA
    Coll Rev; 1987; 4(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 10282074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Health outcomes for a chronic disease in prepaid group practice and fee for service settings. The case of rheumatoid arthritis.
    Yelin EH; Shearn MA; Epstein WV
    Med Care; 1986 Mar; 24(3):236-47. PubMed ID: 3951265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the culture of medical group practices.
    Kralewski JE; Wingert TD; Barbouche MH
    Med Care; 1996 May; 34(5):377-88. PubMed ID: 8614161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of managed care and practice size on primary care physicians' perceived ability to refer.
    Xu T; Rohrer J; Borders T
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2002 Jul; 7(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 12171744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The orginization of medical practice and practice orientations among physicians in prepaid and nonprepaid primary care settings.
    Mechanic D
    Med Care; 1975 Mar; 13(3):189-204. PubMed ID: 1113557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prepaid and fee-for-service practice within a multispecialty group practice.
    Peters D; Steinhauer BW
    J Ambul Care Manage; 1982 Feb; 5(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 10254212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of eye care practices with managed care contracts.
    Solomon MD; Lee PP; Mangione CM; Kapur K; Adams JL; Wickstrom SL; Escarce JJ
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Dec; 8(12):1057-67. PubMed ID: 12500882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Survival of solo practitioners and small group practices in today's challenging marketplace: setting the ground work now--Part II.
    Cascardo D
    J Med Pract Manage; 2011; 26(5):292-5. PubMed ID: 21595382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of patients with hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus treated by different systems and specialties. Results from the medical outcomes study.
    Greenfield S; Rogers W; Mangotich M; Carney MF; Tarlov AR
    JAMA; 1995 Nov; 274(18):1436-44. PubMed ID: 7474189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An HMO with private family physicians coordinating care and controlling costs.
    Moore SH
    J Fam Pract; 1981 Sep; 13(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 7276860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of physician practice setting on utilization and cost of service in an HMO.
    Meier J; Tillotson J
    Top Health Care Financ; 1981; 8(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 6798710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prepayment and the Genesee Health Service.
    Regenstreif D; Fink J; Wolfe J; Gravino G
    Med Group Manage; 1979; 26(6):38-43. PubMed ID: 10245009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.