These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6700289)
21. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. Results from the medical outcomes study. Greenfield S; Nelson EC; Zubkoff M; Manning W; Rogers W; Kravitz RL; Keller A; Tarlov AR; Ware JE JAMA; 1992 Mar; 267(12):1624-30. PubMed ID: 1542172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Costs, choice, and competition: some considerations of alternative delivery systems. Wesley N; Hester RD J Natl Med Assoc; 1984 Nov; 76(11):1079-84. PubMed ID: 6502725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospects for medical group practice under competition. Rossiter LF Med Care; 1984 Jan; 22(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 6694463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Factors affecting physicians' choice to practice in a fee-for-service setting versus an individual practice association. Freund DA; Allen KS Med Care; 1985 Jun; 23(6):799-808. PubMed ID: 4010362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison of the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in health maintenance organizations and fee-for-service practices. Yelin EH; Henke CJ; Kramer JS; Nevitt MC; Shearn M; Epstein WV N Engl J Med; 1985 Apr; 312(15):962-7. PubMed ID: 3974686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Utilization of within-hospital services. A study of the effects of two forms of group practice. Luke RD; Thomson MA Med Care; 1980 Feb; 18(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 7206842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Doctor discontent. A comparison of physician satisfaction in different delivery system settings, 1986 and 1997. Murray A; Montgomery JE; Chang H; Rogers WH; Inui T; Safran DG J Gen Intern Med; 2001 Jul; 16(7):452-9. PubMed ID: 11520382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Report on financing the new model of family medicine. Spann SJ; Ann Fam Med; 2004 Dec; 2 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1-21. PubMed ID: 15654084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spending time with patients: the impact of organizational structure on medical practice. Wolinsky FD; Marder WD Med Care; 1982 Oct; 20(10):1051-9. PubMed ID: 7132466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Health care utilization and outcomes among persons with rheumatoid arthritis in fee-for-service and prepaid group practice settings. Yelin EH; Criswell LA; Feigenbaum PG JAMA; 1996 Oct; 276(13):1048-53. PubMed ID: 8847766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prepaid medical practice: a summary of findings from a recent survey of group practices in the United States. A comparison of fee-for-service and prepaid groups. Held PJ; Reinhardt UE Group Health J; 1980; 1(2):4-15. PubMed ID: 10247922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Prepaid entitlements. A new challenge for physician-patient relationships. Schroeder JL; Clarke JT; Webster JR JAMA; 1985 Dec; 254(21):3080-2. PubMed ID: 4057530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patterns of ambulatory health care in five different delivery systems. Dutton DB Med Care; 1979 Mar; 17(3):221-43. PubMed ID: 763001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The potential of organizations of fee-for-service physicians for achieving significant decreases in hospitalization. Edgahl RH; Taft CH; Friedland J; Linde K Ann Surg; 1977 Sep; 186(3):388-99. PubMed ID: 889380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Physicians and prepaid group practices. Schoenbaum SC Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-76-8. PubMed ID: 15451970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]