These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6700706)

  • 1. Life with the new technologies.
    Nature; 1984 Mar 1-7; 308(5954):1-2. PubMed ID: 6700706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legal and ethical aspects of new reproductive technologies.
    Andrews LB
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 29(1):190-204. PubMed ID: 3955927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confused comment on Warnock.
    Nature; 1984 Nov 29-Dec 5; 312(5993):389. PubMed ID: 6504148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Handling the human embryo.
    Nature; 1984 May 31-Jun 6; 309(5967):387. PubMed ID: 6727993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tempest in the laboratory: medical research on spare embryos from in vitro fertilization.
    Gregoratos B
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):977-1006. PubMed ID: 11655859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Embryo research: UK legislation further delayed.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 1986 Dec 18-31; 324(6098):604. PubMed ID: 3796722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research.
    Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human reproduction: regulated progress or damned interference?
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):202-4. PubMed ID: 6146756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment.
    Van de Weghe B
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lords worry over Warnock.
    Russell W
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1321. PubMed ID: 11653633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Brahams D
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):238-9. PubMed ID: 6146804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations of the Warnock Committee.
    Lancet; 1984 Jul; 2(8396):217-8. PubMed ID: 6146766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. British government hedges bets on embryo research.
    Hadlington S
    Nature; 1987 Dec 3-9; 330(6147):409. PubMed ID: 3683559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assisted fertilization: legal restraints proposed for UK.
    Nature; 1984 Jul 26-Aug 1; 310(5975):266. PubMed ID: 6462211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. UK embryo research: embryo protection bill resurfaces.
    Clarke M
    Nature; 1985 Jun 13-19; 315(6020):534. PubMed ID: 4010770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Embryo research and abortion.
    Nature; 1989 Oct; 341(6244):673. PubMed ID: 2627213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The moral status of the fetus.
    White VM
    Midwives Chron; 1994 Oct; 107(1281):375-9. PubMed ID: 7627746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable.
    Connor S
    New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Moral thinking and government policy: the Warnock Committee on Human Embryology.
    Warnock M
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(3):504-22. PubMed ID: 3852077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology.
    Wells WT
    Lancet; 1984 Sep; 2(8401):531-2. PubMed ID: 6147600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.