These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6701302)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging: effects of magnetic field strength.
    Crooks LE; Arakawa M; Hoenninger J; McCarten B; Watts J; Kaufman L
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 6701302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrogen MR imaging of the head at 0.35 T and 0.7 T: effects of magnetic field strength.
    Posin JP; Arakawa M; Crooks LE; Feinberg DA; Hoenninger JC; Watts JC; Mills CM; Kaufman L
    Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 4059555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conspicuity of tumors of the head and neck on fat-suppressed MR images: T2-weighted fast-spin-echo versus contrast-enhanced T1-weighted conventional spin-echo sequences.
    Dubin MD; Teresi LM; Bradley WG; Jordan JE; Pema PJ; Goergen SK; Tam JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1213-21. PubMed ID: 7717234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images.
    Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: contrast-to-noise ratio as a function of strength of magnetic field.
    Hart HR; Bottomley PA; Edelstein WA; Karr SG; Leue WM; Mueller O; Redington RW; Schenck JF; Smith LS; Vatis D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Dec; 141(6):1195-201. PubMed ID: 6606316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results.
    de Bazelaire CM; Duhamel GD; Rofsky NM; Alsop DC
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):652-9. PubMed ID: 14990831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Field and temperature dependence of contrast in magnetic resonance imaging].
    Rinck PA; Muller RN; Fischer H
    Rofo; 1987 Aug; 147(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 2819980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MR relaxation times in human brain: measurement at 4 T.
    Jezzard P; Duewell S; Balaban RS
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):773-9. PubMed ID: 8638004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multispectral quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of brain iron stores: a theoretical perspective.
    Jara H; Sakai O; Mankal P; Irving RP; Norbash AM
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Feb; 17(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 17179894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic variation of off-resonance prepulses for clinical magnetization transfer contrast imaging at 0.2, 1.5, and 3.0 tesla.
    Martirosian P; Boss A; Deimling M; Kiefer B; Schraml C; Schwenzer NF; Claussen CD; Schick F
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):16-26. PubMed ID: 18097273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. T2-weighted MR imaging of the upper part of the abdomen: should fat suppression be used routinely?
    Lu DS; Saini S; Hahn PF; Goldberg M; Lee MJ; Weissleder R; Gerard B; Halpern E; Cats A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1095-100. PubMed ID: 8165989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple sclerosis lesions and irreversible brain tissue damage: a comparative ultrahigh-field strength magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Sinnecker T; Mittelstaedt P; Dörr J; Pfueller CF; Harms L; Niendorf T; Paul F; Wuerfel J
    Arch Neurol; 2012 Jun; 69(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 22351849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional dynamic susceptibility-weighted perfusion MR imaging at 3.0 T: feasibility and contrast agent dose.
    Manka C; Träber F; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2005 Mar; 234(3):869-77. PubMed ID: 15665227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of HASTE and segmented-HASTE sequences with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the screening evaluation of the brain.
    Sugahara T; Korogi Y; Hirai T; Hamatake S; Ikushima I; Shigematu Y; Takahashi M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 9353469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vivo biochemical 7.0 Tesla magnetic resonance: preliminary results of dGEMRIC, zonal T2, and T2* mapping of articular cartilage.
    Welsch GH; Mamisch TC; Hughes T; Zilkens C; Quirbach S; Scheffler K; Kraff O; Schweitzer ME; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):619-26. PubMed ID: 18708855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The use of the T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence in studying the neurocranium. A comparison with the conventional T2-weighted spin-echo sequence].
    Siewert C; Hosten N; Felix R
    Rofo; 1994 Jul; 161(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 8043764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sampling bandwidth and fat suppression: effects on long TR/TE MR imaging of the abdomen and pelvis at 1.5 T.
    Mitchell DG; Vinitski S; Rifkin MD; Burk DL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Aug; 153(2):419-25. PubMed ID: 2750630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subacute intracranial hemorrhage: contribution of spin density to appearance on spin-echo MR images.
    Hackney DB; Atlas SW; Grossman RI; Gomori JM; Goldberg HI; Zimmerman RA; Bilaniuk LT
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):199-202. PubMed ID: 3628771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of relaxation times and spin density calculated from routine MR imaging sequences: clinical study of the CNS.
    Kjos BO; Ehman RL; Brant-Zawadzki M; Kelly WM; Norman D; Newton TH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jun; 144(6):1165-70. PubMed ID: 2988318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.