104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6701786)
1. Venous access: a prospective, randomized study of the Hickman catheter.
Wagman LD; Kirkemo A; Johnston MR
Surgery; 1984 Mar; 95(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 6701786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters.
Haire WD; Lieberman RP; Lund GB; Edney JA; Kessinger A; Armitage JO
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1991 Jan; 7(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 1675136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Central venous catheter-related infection in a prospective and observational study of 2,595 catheters.
Lorente L; Henry C; Martín MM; Jiménez A; Mora ML
Crit Care; 2005; 9(6):R631-5. PubMed ID: 16280064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Malpositioning of Hickman catheters, left versus right sided attempts.
Unal AE; Bayar S; Arat M; Ilhan O
Transfus Apher Sci; 2003 Feb; 28(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 12620263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.
Araújo C; Silva JP; Antunes P; Fernandes JM; Dias C; Pereira H; Dias T; Fougo JL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 17566692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.
Cowl CT; Weinstock JV; Al-Jurf A; Ephgrave K; Murray JA; Dillon K
Clin Nutr; 2000 Aug; 19(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10952794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients.
Brandt B; DePalma J; Irwin M; Shogan J; Lucke JF
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Jun; 23(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 8792352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Central venous catheterization: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Mer M; Duse AG; Galpin JS; Richards GA
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost; 2009 Feb; 15(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 18593746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of catheter-related infection and tip colonization between internal jugular and subclavian central venous catheters in surgical neonates.
Breschan C; Platzer M; Jost R; Schaumberger F; Stettner H; Likar R
Anesthesiology; 2007 Dec; 107(6):946-53. PubMed ID: 18043063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulmonary artery catheterization: a prospective study of internal jugular and subclavian approaches.
Senagore A; Waller JD; Bonnell BW; Bursch LR; Scholten DJ
Crit Care Med; 1987 Jan; 15(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 3539524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Groshong versus Hickman catheters.
Pasquale MD; Campbell JM; Magnant CM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 May; 174(5):408-10. PubMed ID: 1570619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The natural history of tunneled hemodialysis catheters removed or exchanged: a single-institution experience.
Alomari AI; Falk A
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 17327555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Catheter colonization in acute renal failure patients: comparison of central venous and dialysis catheters.
Souweine B; Liotier J; Heng AE; Isnard M; Ackoundou-N'Guessan C; Deteix P; Traoré O
Am J Kidney Dis; 2006 May; 47(5):879-87. PubMed ID: 16632028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Infectious and non-infectious complications of tunneled central catheters in hematologic patients].
Albo López C; López Rodríguez D; Constenla Camba MI; Jimenéz Blanco A; Araujo LF; García-Medina J
Sangre (Barc); 1999 Jun; 44(3):176-81. PubMed ID: 10481577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Complications of central venous catheterization in hematologic patients--prospective study of 193 catheterizations].
Faber E; Mociková K; Grochal B; Koróny S; Matecek L
Vnitr Lek; 1994 Dec; 40(12):765-9. PubMed ID: 7839628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of central venous catheter type and methods on catheter-related colonization and bacteraemia.
Moretti EW; Ofstead CL; Kristy RM; Wetzler HP
J Hosp Infect; 2005 Oct; 61(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 16026898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized, prospective trial of standard Hickman compared with Groshong central venous catheters in pediatric oncology patients.
Warner BW; Haygood MM; Davies SL; Hennies GA
J Am Coll Surg; 1996 Aug; 183(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 8696545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomized comparison of an attached silver-impregnated cuff to prevent central venous catheter-associated infection.
Smith HO; DeVictoria CL; Garfinkel D; Anderson P; Goldberg GL; Soeiro R; Elia G; Runowicz CD
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Jul; 58(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 7789897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding complications of long-term venous access.
Henriques HF; Karmy-Jones R; Knoll SM; Copes WS; Giordano JM
Am Surg; 1993 Sep; 59(9):555-8. PubMed ID: 8368659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
