These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6702750)

  • 1. Quality assurance of histopathologic diagnoses: a prospective audit of three thousand cases.
    Whitehead ME; Fitzwater JE; Lindley SK; Kern SB; Ulirsch RC; Winecoff WF
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Apr; 81(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 6702750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development and testing of a laboratory information system-driven tool for pre-sign-out quality assurance of random surgical pathology reports.
    Owens SR; Dhir R; Yousem SA; Kelly SM; Piccoli A; Wiehagen L; Lassige K; Parwani AV
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2010 Jun; 133(6):836-41. PubMed ID: 20472840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial experience with a novel pre-sign-out quality assurance tool for review of random surgical pathology diagnoses in a subspecialty-based university practice.
    Owens SR; Wiehagen LT; Kelly SM; Piccoli AL; Lassige K; Yousem SA; Dhir R; Parwani AV
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1319-23. PubMed ID: 20697250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Local audit of diagnostic surgical pathology as a tool for quality assurance.
    Malami SA; Iliyasu Y
    Niger J Med; 2008; 17(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 18686837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
    Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Consultation (second opinion on biopsies) as an instrument of quality control in histopathologic diagnosis].
    Fakan F
    Cesk Patol; 2001 Jan; 37(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 11268704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
    Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assurance goals in surgical pathology.
    Rickert RR
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1990 Nov; 114(11):1157-62. PubMed ID: 2241527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recommendations for pathology peer review.
    Morton D; Sellers RS; Barale-Thomas E; Bolon B; George C; Hardisty JF; Irizarry A; McKay JS; Odin M; Teranishi M
    Toxicol Pathol; 2010 Dec; 38(7):1118-27. PubMed ID: 20924082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Internal quality assurance activities of a surgical pathology department in an Australian teaching hospital.
    Zardawi IM; Bennett G; Jain S; Brown M
    J Clin Pathol; 1998 Sep; 51(9):695-9. PubMed ID: 9930076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance of anatomic pathology diagnoses: Comparison of alternate approaches.
    Layfield LJ; Frazier SR
    Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Feb; 213(2):126-129. PubMed ID: 28040330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and preliminary evaluation of the VPS ReplaySuite: a virtual double-headed microscope for pathology.
    Johnston DJ; Costello SP; Dervan PA; O'Shea DG
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2005 Apr; 5():10. PubMed ID: 15845147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective peer review in surgical pathology.
    Lind AC; Bewtra C; Healy JC; Sims KL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 7572817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality assurance in surgical pathology--personal and peer assessment.
    Murthy MS; Derman H
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Mar; 75(3 Suppl):462-6. PubMed ID: 7468536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Peer review in toxicologic histopathology: its necessity, type and procedure].
    Yoshitomi K
    J Toxicol Sci; 1998 May; 23 Suppl 1():1-9. PubMed ID: 9617732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extraneous tissue in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 275 laboratories.
    Gephardt GN; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Nov; 120(11):1009-14. PubMed ID: 12049100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Review of diagnostic error in anatomical pathology and the role and value of second opinions in error prevention.
    Peck M; Moffat D; Latham B; Badrick T
    J Clin Pathol; 2018 Nov; 71(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 30068638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance of histopathologic diagnosis in the British Army: role of the Army Histopathology Registry in completed case review.
    Whitehead ME; Grieve JH; Payne MJ; Ross MS
    J R Army Med Corps; 1986 Jun; 132(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 3735191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic concordance of breast pathologists: lessons from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Pathology External Quality Assurance Scheme.
    Rakha EA; Ahmed MA; Aleskandarany MA; Hodi Z; Lee AH; Pinder SE; Ellis IO
    Histopathology; 2017 Mar; 70(4):632-642. PubMed ID: 28028831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assurance in anatomic pathology.
    Rickert RR
    Clin Lab Med; 1986 Dec; 6(4):697-706. PubMed ID: 3539481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.