These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6702924)
1. The cervical cap: a retrospective study of an alternative contraceptive technique. Johnson JM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Mar; 148(5):604-8. PubMed ID: 6702924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The cervical cap: effectiveness as a contraceptive. Boehm D J Nurse Midwifery; 1983; 28(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 6551434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Prentif contraceptive cervical cap: a contemporary study of its clinical safety and effectiveness. Koch JP Contraception; 1982 Feb; 25(2):135-59. PubMed ID: 7075188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use effectiveness of the Prentif cervical cap in private practice: a prospective study. Lehfeldt H; Sivin I Contraception; 1984 Oct; 30(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 6509986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contraception with the cervical cap: effectiveness, safety, continuity of use, and user satisfaction. Powell MG; Mears BJ; Deber RB; Ferguson D Contraception; 1986 Mar; 33(3):215-32. PubMed ID: 3720304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Prentif contraceptive cervical cap: acceptability aspects and their implications for future cap design. Koch JP Contraception; 1982 Feb; 25(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 7075189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cervical cap as a barrier contraceptive. Cagen R Contraception; 1986 May; 33(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 3757513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cervical cap: effectiveness, safety, and acceptability as a barrier contraceptive. Lauersen NH; Wilson KH; Graves ZR; Calhoun F; Leeds LE; Antonopoulos Y Mt Sinai J Med; 1986 Apr; 53(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 3487717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cervical cap as a contraceptive alternative. Johnson MA Nurse Pract; 1985 Jan; 10(1):37, 41-2, 45. PubMed ID: 3881697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's perceptions of the pill's potential health risks in Sri Lanka. Thapa S; Salgado M; Fortney JA; Grubb GS; De Silva V Asia Pac Popul J; 1987 Sep; 2(3):39-56. PubMed ID: 12268936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of cervical caps at the university of California/Berkeley. Smith GG J Am Coll Health Assoc; 1980 Oct; 29(2):93-4. PubMed ID: 7430501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonspermicide fit-free diaphragm trial reported. Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1984; 5(3):7. PubMed ID: 12279800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cervical cap: an alternative contraceptive. Canavan PA; Lewis CA JOGN Nurs; 1981; 10(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 6911312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Natural Family Planning methods and Barrier: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines]. Hassoun D Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2018 Dec; 46(12):873-882. PubMed ID: 30389545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative trial of the Today contraceptive sponge and diaphragm. Edelman DA; McIntyre SL; Harper J Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Dec; 150(7):869-76. PubMed ID: 6095664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of contraception in women who present for termination of pregnancy in inner London. Price SJ; Barrett G; Smith C; Paterson C Public Health; 1997 Nov; 111(6):377-82. PubMed ID: 9392968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]