These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6703007)
1. An anticipated threshold technique for measuring contrast sensitivity. Brussell EM; Cavanagh P Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Feb; 61(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 6703007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast sensitivity as a function of exposure duration in the amblyopic visual system. Loshin DS; Jones R Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Jul; 59(7):561-7. PubMed ID: 7124895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multi-flash campimetry in multiple sclerosis. Brussell EM; White CW; Bross M; Mustillo P; Borenstein M Curr Eye Res; 1981-1982; 1(11):671-7. PubMed ID: 7346238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A hypothesis-based approach to clinical psychophysics and to the design of visual tests: the Proctor Lecture. Regan D Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 May; 43(5):1311-23. PubMed ID: 11980840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing spatial vision - automated measurement of the contrast-sensitivity function in the hooded rat. Keller J; Strasburger H; Cerutti DT; Sabel BA J Neurosci Methods; 2000 Apr; 97(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 10788664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of electrophysiological and psychophysical measurement of the contrast sensitivity function in humans. Allen D; Norcia AM; Tyler CW Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 Jun; 63(6):442-9. PubMed ID: 3728639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial frequency thresholds versus border enhancement: sensitivity to retinal defocus. Remole A Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Feb; 59(2):135-45. PubMed ID: 7065106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring contrast sensitivity with gratings: A new simple technique for the early diagnosis of retinal and neurological disease. Arden G J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Jan; 50(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 762375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: a comparison of three psychophysical methods. Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Lamers P; Mager A; Zeinstra J; Kooijman AC Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15649179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Masked detection of gratings: the standard model revisited. Nachmias J Vision Res; 1993 Jul; 33(10):1359-65. PubMed ID: 8333158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The persistence of dichoptically presented grating patterns. Fresco BB; Levi DM Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1982 Apr; 59(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 7102789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Role of local adaptation in the fading of stabilized images. Burbeck CA; Kelly DH J Opt Soc Am A; 1984 Feb; 1(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 6707778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of astigmatism on sensitivity to sinusoidal and square wave gratings. Kinney JA Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1980 Jun; 57(6):372-7. PubMed ID: 7406005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suprathreshold wavelet coefficient quantization in complex stimuli: psychophysical evaluation and analysis. Ramos MG; Hemami SS J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Oct; 18(10):2385-97. PubMed ID: 11583255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of threshold in afterimage visibility. Leguire LE; Blake R J Opt Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(9):1232-7. PubMed ID: 7131117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]