These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Two-dimensional approach to psychophysical orientation tuning. Dannemiller JL; Ver Hoeve JN J Opt Soc Am A; 1990 Jan; 7(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 2299445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contrast sensitivity loss in multiple sclerosis. Selectivity by eye, orientation, and spatial frequency measured with the evoked potential. Kupersmith MJ; Seiple WH; Nelson JI; Carr RE Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1984 Jun; 25(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 6724832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A new technique to measure contrast sensitivity in human infants. Adams RJ; Mercer ME; Courage ML Optom Vis Sci; 1992 Jun; 69(6):440-6. PubMed ID: 1641225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Reaction time as a measure of binocular interaction in human vision. Blake R; Martens W; Di Gianfilippo A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Aug; 19(8):930-41. PubMed ID: 7409986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spatial-frequency discrimination and detection: comparison of postadaptation thresholds. Regan D; Beverley KI J Opt Soc Am; 1983 Dec; 73(12):1684-90. PubMed ID: 6663371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Legge GE; Ross JA; Luebker A; LaMay JM Optom Vis Sci; 1989 Dec; 66(12):843-53. PubMed ID: 2626251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Recovery of spatial vision during dark adaptation in normal subjects. Margrain TH; Thomson WD Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Nov; 17(6):509-15. PubMed ID: 9666925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Supraliminal contrast sensitivity functions in recovered optic neuritis. Tagami Y; Isayama Y; Masumi K; Bo H Jpn J Ophthalmol; 1982; 26(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 7131929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Psychophysical tests of vision and hearing in patients with multiple sclerosis. Regan D Adv Neurol; 1981; 31():217-37. PubMed ID: 7325044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Discrimination of spatial phase in central and peripheral vision. Morrone MC; Burr DC; Spinelli D Vision Res; 1989; 29(4):433-45. PubMed ID: 2781733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Correlation between ERG oscillatory potential and psychophysical contrast sensitivity in diabetes. Kawasaki K; Yonemura K; Yokogawa Y; Saito N; Kawakita S Doc Ophthalmol; 1986; 64(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 3608761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Contrast sensitivity study of preschoolers]. Puchkovskaia NA; Seniakina AS; Tsykalo AL Oftalmol Zh; 1984; (3):138-40. PubMed ID: 6483322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of a quantitative method to measure vision in children with chronic cortical visual impairment. Good WV Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2001; 99():253-69. PubMed ID: 11797314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Localized effects of spatial frequency adaptation. Williams DW; Wilson HR; Cowan JD J Opt Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(7):878-87. PubMed ID: 7108646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of tablet computers for visual function assessment. Bodduluri L; Boon MY; Dain SJ Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):548-558. PubMed ID: 27004485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. EVOKED POTENTIALS AND CORRELATED JUDGEMENTS OF BRIGHTNESS AS FUNCTIONS OF INTERFLASH INTERVALS. BARTLETT NR; WHITE CT Science; 1965 May; 148(3672):980-1. PubMed ID: 14277845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]