285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6703885)
1. Energy expenditure of paraplegic patients standing and walking with two knee-ankle-foot orthoses.
Merkel KD; Miller NE; Westbrook PR; Merritt JL
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 65(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 6703885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paraplegic energy expenditure during negotiation of architectural barriers.
Miller NE; Merritt JL; Merkel KD; Westbrook PR
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1984 Dec; 65(12):778-9. PubMed ID: 6508519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determinants of gait performance following spinal cord injury.
Waters RL; Yakura JS; Adkins R; Barnes G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 Nov; 70(12):811-8. PubMed ID: 2818152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of stance control orthoses on gait characteristics and energy expenditure in knee-ankle-foot orthosis users.
Davis PC; Bach TM; Pereira DM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 20470059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Energy expenditure in patients with low-, mid-, or high-thoracic paraplegia using Scott-Craig knee-ankle-foot orthoses.
Merkel KD; Miller NE; Merritt JL
Mayo Clin Proc; 1985 Mar; 60(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 3974297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation of the thigh muscles.
Hirokawa S; Grimm M; Le T; Solomonow M; Baratta RV; Shoji H; D'Ambrosia RD
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Aug; 71(9):687-94. PubMed ID: 2375676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy cost of ambulation with different methods of foot and ankle immobilization.
Fowler PT; Botte MJ; Mathewson JW; Speth SR; Byrne TP; Sutherland DH
J Orthop Res; 1993 May; 11(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 8326448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ankle-foot orthoses: effect on energy expenditure of gait in spastic diplegic children.
Mossberg KA; Linton KA; Friske K
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Jun; 71(7):490-4. PubMed ID: 2350218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxygen consumption, oxygen cost and physiological cost index in polio survivors: a comparison of walking without orthosis, with an ordinary or a carbon-fibre reinforced plastic knee-ankle-foot orthosis.
Hachisuka K; Makino K; Wada F; Saeki S; Yoshimoto N
J Rehabil Med; 2007 Oct; 39(8):646-50. PubMed ID: 17896057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Energy cost of ambulation in health and disability: a literature review.
Fisher SV; Gullickson G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1978 Mar; 59(3):124-33. PubMed ID: 148252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of FES with KAFO for providing ambulation and upright mobility in a child with a complete thoracic spinal cord injury.
Bonaroti D; Akers J; Smith BT; Mulcahey MJ; Betz RR
J Spinal Cord Med; 1999; 22(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 10685380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Parawalker: energy cost of walking.
Banta JV; Bell KJ; Muik EA; Fezio J
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 1991 Dec; 1 Suppl 1():7-10. PubMed ID: 1807396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion.
Waters RL; Lunsford BR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1985 Oct; 67(8):1245-50. PubMed ID: 4055849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the performance of paraplegic subjects during walking with a new design of reciprocal gait orthosis.
Karimi MT; Fatoye F
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2016; 11(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 25069902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Energy costs of walking and standing with functional neuromuscular stimulation and long leg braces.
Marsolais EB; Edwards BG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Apr; 69(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 3258509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Physiological Cost Index of walking with an isocentric reciprocating gait orthosis among patients with T(12) - L(1) spinal cord injury.
Leung AK; Wong AF; Wong EC; Hutchins SW
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2009 Mar; 33(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19235067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of sole wedges on frontal plane knee kinetics, in isolation and in combination with representative rigid and semi-rigid ankle-foot-orthoses.
Schmalz T; Blumentritt S; Drewitz H; Freslier M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 16567026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Energy expenditure of diplegic ambulation using flexible plastic ankle foot orthoses.
Suzuki N; Shinohara T; Kimizuka M; Yamaguchi K; Mita K
Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 2000; 59(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10983255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical experience with a new hip-knee-ankle-foot orthotic system using a medial single hip joint for paraplegic standing and walking.
Saitoh E; Suzuki T; Sonoda S; Fujitani J; Tomita Y; Chino N
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1996; 75(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 8663927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of conventional hip-knee-ankle-foot orthoses versus reciprocating-gait orthoses for children with high-level paraparesis.
Katz DE; Haideri N; Song K; Wyrick P
J Pediatr Orthop; 1997; 17(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 9150029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
