These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 670474)

  • 1. The apical artifact: elevated attenuation values toward the apex of the skull.
    Di Chiro G; Brooks RA; Dubal L; Chew E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1978 Jan; 2(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 670474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An inaccuracy in computed tomography: the energy dependence of CT values.
    Zatz LM; Alvarez RE
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 866662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variations in measured computed tomography number values.
    Faulkner K; Moores BM
    Radiography; 1985; 51(597):163-7. PubMed ID: 4011863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An improved method for computed tomography of the base of the skull in head scanners that utilize a water bag.
    Maravilla KR; Dowdey JE; Moore J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1978 Jan; 2(1):120-3. PubMed ID: 670465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structured noise in computed tomography: effects of periodic error sources.
    Parker DL; Couch JL; Peschmann KR; Smith V
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):722-32. PubMed ID: 7155075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effects of beam weakening and beam hardening on the measured CT values].
    Schultz E; Lackner K
    Computertomographie; 1981 Jun; 1(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 7187286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artifacts in computed tomography of the posterior fossa: a comparative phantom study.
    Moström U; Ytterbergh C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1986; 10(4):560-6. PubMed ID: 3734195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A method for correcting bone induced artifacts in computed tomography scanners.
    Joseph PM; Spital RD
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1978 Jan; 2(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 670461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Whole body scanners: a comparison between the IGE 8800 and 9800.
    Brooker MJ
    Radiography; 1986; 52(602):61-4. PubMed ID: 3726085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mass estimates by computed tomography: physical density from CT numbers.
    Mull RT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Nov; 143(5):1101-4. PubMed ID: 6333158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.
    Kinahan PE; Hasegawa BH; Beyer T
    Semin Nucl Med; 2003 Jul; 33(3):166-79. PubMed ID: 12931319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The unreliability of CT numbers as absolute values.
    Levi C; Gray JE; McCullough EC; Hattery RR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Sep; 139(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 6981306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relation between carbon ion ranges and x-ray CT numbers.
    Jäkel O; Jacob C; Schardt D; Karger CP; Hartmann GH
    Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):701-3. PubMed ID: 11339768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The removal of a "cupping" artefact from brain images produced by the EMI 7070 CT scanner.
    Mott DJ; Zheng GL; Eddleston B
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Sep; 58(693):873-80. PubMed ID: 3916065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimizing contrast agents with respect to reducing beam hardening in nonmedical X-ray computed tomography experiments.
    Nakashima Y; Nakano T
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 24463388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individualized computer tomography of the skull with the EMI scanner using the 160 X 160 matrix.
    Cornell SH; Musallam JJ; Chiu CL; Christie JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Apr; 126(4):779-85. PubMed ID: 179346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computed Tomography Number Measurement Consistency Under Different Beam Hardening Conditions: Comparison Between Dual-Energy Spectral Computed Tomography and Conventional Computed Tomography Imaging in Phantom Experiment.
    He T; Qian X; Zhai R; Yang Z
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(6):981-5. PubMed ID: 26196347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiation dose and somatic risk from computed tomography.
    Faulkner K; Moores BM
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(4):483-8. PubMed ID: 2958068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The environmental density artifact: a beam-hardening effect in computed tomography.
    Rao PS; Alfidi RJ
    Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):223-7. PubMed ID: 7291529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Diagnostic advantages of the adjustable holder (gantry) in skull computerized tomography].
    Stoeter P; Schumacher M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1980 Apr; 33(4):79-87. PubMed ID: 7455803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.