These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6705928)
1. A proposal for per capita distribution of research funds with administrative flexibility. Hirsch HR Fed Proc; 1984 Apr; 43(5):7a-8a. PubMed ID: 6705928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 1: the assignment and referral processes. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Jul; 36(8):2066-8. PubMed ID: 872944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The grant racket. Ross PM Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6357):197. PubMed ID: 1731211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review of researchgrant applications at the National Institutes of Health 2: review by an initial review group. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Aug; 36(9):2186-90. PubMed ID: 885260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review of research grant applications at the National Institutes of Health 3: review by an advisory board/council. Henley C Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2335-8. PubMed ID: 892000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. National Institutes of Health. Healy and Dingell lock horns. Aldhous P Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6335):461. PubMed ID: 1865895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Federal work force. Can outsiders do better in managing NIH grants? Kaiser J Science; 2003 Mar; 299(5614):1823. PubMed ID: 12649448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Proposals for improving the Peer Review System of the National Institutes of Health. Kirschstein RL Clin Res; 1977 Dec; 25(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 10304717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Does peer review at the US National Institutes of Health need modifying? Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Feb; 16(2):238. PubMed ID: 18284879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Letter: The National Institutes of Health grants peer review study team. Looney GL Am J Chin Med (Gard City N Y); 1976; 4(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 937242 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. France. Will French science swallow Zerhouni's strong medicine? Enserink M Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5906):1312. PubMed ID: 19039109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparability of the American Cancer Society and National Institutes of Health peer review systems. Vivona S; Do van Quy D Cancer Res; 1973 Apr; 33(4):919. PubMed ID: 4739656 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Remembering the peer in peer review. O'Connell KA Nurs Res; 1987; 36(6):379-80. PubMed ID: 3671127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Proposal for public archive draws support, criticism. Travis K J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(19):1416. PubMed ID: 15467028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial: The Peer Review System and NIH. Bucy PC Surg Neurol; 1976 May; 5(5):319-20. PubMed ID: 1265652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dr Healy, Dr Kennedy and Mr Dingell. Nature; 1991 Aug; 352(6335):457-8. PubMed ID: 1865893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]