These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6706025)

  • 1. Binaural fusion, masking level differences, and auditory brain stem responses in children with language-learning disabilities.
    Roush J; Tait CA
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 6706025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study.
    Wong WY; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 14770018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forward acoustic masking enhances the auditory brainstem response in a diotic, but not dichotic, paradigm in salicylate-induced tinnitus.
    Liu XP; Chen L
    Hear Res; 2015 May; 323():51-60. PubMed ID: 25668125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) in children with specific language impairment (SLI). Central auditory tests.
    Dlouha O; Novak A; Vokral J
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jun; 71(6):903-7. PubMed ID: 17382411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response show the binaural masking level difference?
    Ishida IM; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):713-5. PubMed ID: 19701090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combination of binaural and harmonic masking release effects in the detection of a single component in complex tones.
    Klein-Hennig M; Dietz M; Hohmann V
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():23-31. PubMed ID: 29310976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Central auditory processing assessment: a French-speaking battery.
    Demanez L; Dony-Closon B; Lhonneux-Ledoux E; Demanez JP
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 2003; 57(4):275-90. PubMed ID: 14714945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Normative data for diagnosing auditory processing disorder in Norwegian children aged 7-12 years.
    Mattsson TS; Follestad T; Andersson S; Lind O; Øygarden J; Nordgård S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28835140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural interaction in specific language impairment: an auditory evoked potential study.
    Clarke EM; Adams C
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2007 Apr; 49(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 17376138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.
    Henning GB; Richards VM; Lentz JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3229-40. PubMed ID: 16334902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of the dichotic listening technique with learning disabilities.
    Obrzut JE; Mahoney EB
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jul; 76(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 21429648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human frequency-following responses to binaural masking level difference stimuli.
    Wilson JR; Krishnan A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 Mar; 16(3):184-95. PubMed ID: 15844743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Binaural masking release in children with Down syndrome.
    Porter HL; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Tharpe AM
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):e134-42. PubMed ID: 24535557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audiologic detection of auditory processing disorders in children.
    Martin FN; Clark JG
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 614324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing monotic and diotic selective auditory attention abilities in children.
    Cherry R; Rubinstein A
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2006 Apr; 37(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 16646216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural sensitivity to temporal fine structure and lateralization ability in children with suspected (central) auditory processing disorder.
    Lotfi Y; Ahmadi T; Moossavi A; Bakhshi E
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Feb; 46(1):64-69. PubMed ID: 29954636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The binaural interaction component (BIC) in children with central auditory processing disorders (CAPD).
    Delb W; Strauss DJ; Hohenberg G; Plinkert PK
    Int J Audiol; 2003 Oct; 42(7):401-12. PubMed ID: 14582636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening for auditory processing performance in primary school children.
    Mourad M; Hassan M; El-Banna M; Asal S; Hamza Y
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):355-69. PubMed ID: 25879240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory processing limitations in low verbal children: evidence from a two-response dichotic listening task.
    Dermody P; Katsch R; Mackie K
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(6):272-7. PubMed ID: 6653929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: binaural unmasking.
    Van Deun L; van Wieringen A; Francart T; Scherf F; Dhooge IJ; Deggouj N; Desloovere C; Van de Heyning PH; Offeciers FE; De Raeve L; Wouters J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(4):240-7. PubMed ID: 19141992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.