165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6707415)
1. Automated perimetry--what is it? Who needs it?
Elman JW
J Am Optom Assoc; 1984 Feb; 55(2):119-21. PubMed ID: 6707415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons of glaucomatous visual fields using the black tangent screen and the Goldmann perimeter.
Portney GL; Rubenzer MA
Surv Ophthalmol; 1972; 17(3):164-7. PubMed ID: 4137588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [A method of autocampimetric study of the visual field].
Zurgaft MB
Vestn Oftalmol; 1988; 104(5):55-8. PubMed ID: 3222836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Simple method of multiple central static perimetry and the initial results of its use].
Volkov VV; Sergeev VP; Bugrova AF
Vestn Oftalmol; 1983; (4):48-51. PubMed ID: 6636425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Static perimetry in glaucoma (a comparison with kinetic perimetry).
Khamar BM
Indian J Ophthalmol; 1982 Jul; 30(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 7166424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Glaucoma like defect on automated perimetry caused by cataract.
Thomas R; Kuriakose T; George T
Indian J Ophthalmol; 1996 Sep; 44(3):167-8. PubMed ID: 9018996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Changes in the visual fields in glaucoma: static and kinetic perimetry in 2,000 patients.
Morin JD
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1979; 77():622-42. PubMed ID: 397664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Manual projection perimetry combined with a pattern (author's transl)].
Fischer FW
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1981 May; 178(5):392-6. PubMed ID: 7253532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Computerized perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucoma].
Mocanu C
Oftalmologia; 1993; 37(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 8338826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The ability of Medmont M600 automated perimetry to detect threats to fixation.
Zhang L; Drance SM; Douglas GR
J Glaucoma; 1997 Aug; 6(4):259-62. PubMed ID: 9264306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparative effectiveness of modified selective perimetry in the early detection of visual field changes in glaucoma].
Sabaeva GF; Nemtseev GI
Vestn Oftalmol; 1986; 102(3):69-71. PubMed ID: 3727256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated perimetry and threats to fixation.
Realini T; Khouri AS
Ophthalmology; 1998 Sep; 105(9):1575; author reply 1575-6. PubMed ID: 9754152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated perimetry and threats to fixation.
Honavar SG
Ophthalmology; 1998 Sep; 105(9):1574-5. PubMed ID: 9754151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Correlation between glaucomatous hemifield scotomas in white-on-white perimetry and blue-on-yellow perimetry using the oculus twinfield perimeter].
Denk PO; Markovic M; Knorr M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2004 Feb; 221(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 14986209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Methods for screening the visual field for glaucoma].
Volkov VV
Vestn Oftalmol; 1998; 114(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9584628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical trials of the Fieldmaster R-225 automatic perimeter].
Ichioka T; Tashiro T; Hatano M; Miura K
Josai Shika Daigaku Kiyo; 1983; 12(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 6585250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ["Psychogenic" changes in the visual field. A study with the automatic perimeter Octopus].
Brandt F; Neuhann T
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1983; 79(6):536-8. PubMed ID: 6873826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Computerized automatic perimetry (Octopus). Initial results].
Bec P; Wetterwald N; Arne JL; Mathis A; Richer R; Beussinger M
Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr; 1981 Nov; 81(11):941-3. PubMed ID: 7340969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Modern techniques in perimetry.
Newman M
Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1967; 7(4):949-1003. PubMed ID: 5607340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of visual evoked potentials, automated perimetry and frequency-doubling perimetry in early detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
Sarić D; Mandić Z; Iveković R; Geber MZ; Benić G; Tomić Z; Grgić D
Coll Antropol; 2005; 29 Suppl 1():111-3. PubMed ID: 16193690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
