These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6707574)

  • 1. Sources of visual field interference in children and adults.
    Miller LK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1984 Feb; 37(1):141-57. PubMed ID: 6707574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetries in perception of tachistoscopically presented horizontal and vertical random-letter strings.
    Webb RD; Fisher-Ingram L; Hope P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):531-8. PubMed ID: 6634336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lexical decision, parafoveal eccentricity and visual hemifield.
    Babkoff H; Genser S; Hegge FW
    Cortex; 1985 Dec; 21(4):581-93. PubMed ID: 4092485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peripheral-foveal scanning and the identification of heteropalindromes in the visual half-fields.
    Fundin R; Lembessis E; Charles WG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Apr; 62(2):499-509. PubMed ID: 3503257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The lateralization of hemispheric function in the recognition of Chinese characters.
    Zhang WT; Peng RX
    Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(6):679-82. PubMed ID: 6664486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of type of center fixation stimulus on visual-field preferences: a preliminary study.
    Moore WH; Snow KA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 6634317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli.
    Alivisatos B; Wilding J
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 7187633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric asymmetry for processing unpronounceable and pronounceable letter trigrams.
    Eng TL; Hellige JB
    Brain Lang; 1994 May; 46(4):517-35. PubMed ID: 8044675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexical decision time as a function of visual field and stimulus probability.
    Babkoff H; Ben-Uriah Y
    Cortex; 1983 Apr; 19(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 6851586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition.
    Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are there different methods of lexical access for words presented in the left and right visual fields?
    Schwartz S; Montagner S; Kirsner K
    Brain Lang; 1987 Jul; 31(2):301-7. PubMed ID: 3620904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual hemifield asymmetry for naming concrete nouns and verbs in children between seven and eleven years of age.
    Ellis AW; Young AW
    Cortex; 1981 Dec; 17(4):617-23. PubMed ID: 7344826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lexical decision and visual hemifield: an examination of the RT-accuracy relationship.
    Babkoff H; Faust M
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(5):711-25. PubMed ID: 3211289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age differences in peripheral letter perception.
    Taylor HG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1982 Feb; 8(1):106-12. PubMed ID: 6460076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemispheric differences in the perception of words and faces in deaf and hearing children.
    Szelag E; Wasilewski R; Fersten E
    Scand J Psychol; 1992; 33(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 1594892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemispheric asymmetries in phonological processing.
    Lukatela G; Carello C; Savić M; Turvey MT
    Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(3):341-50. PubMed ID: 3736816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateral differences in lexical access: word length vs. stimulus length.
    Bruyer R; Janlin D
    Brain Lang; 1989 Aug; 37(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 2765858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential processing in hemispheric word recognition: the impact of initial letter discriminability on the OUP naming effect.
    Lindell AK; Nicholls ME; Kwantes PJ; Castles A
    Brain Lang; 2005 May; 93(2):160-72. PubMed ID: 15781304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual-field differences for a number--non-number classification of alphabetic and ideographic stimuli.
    Peereman R; Holender D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1985 May; 37(2):197-216. PubMed ID: 4023272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral or hemispheric asymmetry: is there a default option?
    Schwartz S; Kirsner K
    Brain Cogn; 1986 Jul; 5(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 3756010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.