These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6707830)

  • 1. Glass and rubber closure effects on the pH of water I. A preliminary investigation.
    Preston WA; Anderson NR
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1984; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 6707830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glass and rubber closure effects on the pH of water II. A proposed mechanism of interaction.
    Preston WA; Anderson NR
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1985; 39(1):28-47. PubMed ID: 3973802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of primary packaging on the quality of parenteral products.
    Solomun L; Ibric S; Boltic Z; Djuric Z; Stupar B
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Nov; 48(3):744-8. PubMed ID: 18786797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rubber closures for freeze-dried products.
    Hopkins GH
    Dev Biol Stand; 1976 Oct; 36():139-44. PubMed ID: 1030412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic approach for screening glass containers and elastomeric closures for use with parenteral solutions.
    White F; Koberda M; Chilamkurti R
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2008; 62(3):157-76. PubMed ID: 18661866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative and mechanistic measurements of parenteral vial container/closure integrity. Leakage quantitation.
    Morton DK; Lordi NG; Ambrosio TJ
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1989; 43(2):88-97. PubMed ID: 2709241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Practical fundamentals of glass, rubber, and plastic sterile packaging systems.
    Sacha GA; Saffell-Clemmer W; Abram K; Akers MJ
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2010; 15(1):6-34. PubMed ID: 20088708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a disposable rubber closure or bulk irrigating solutions.
    Newton DW; Rogers AG; Croswell RW; Hendrix L
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1972 Aug; 29(8):678-83. PubMed ID: 5052414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tests for measuring consistent closure quality.
    Hopkins GH
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1969; 23(3):105-13. PubMed ID: 5807463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of the hydrolytic resistance of glass containers using pH determination. Problems and methods for the determination of the chemical resistance of the internal surface of vials].
    Rehm K
    Boll Chim Farm; 1967 Jun; 106(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 5615990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative and mechanistic measurements of container/closure integrity: viscoelastic measurements of elastomeric closures.
    Morton DK; Lordi NG
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1988; 42(4):127-41. PubMed ID: 3183867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Chemical stability of flasks made of alkaline glass: the liberation of alkalinity under pharmacy conditions].
    Belova OI; Karchevskaia VV; Kudakova NA; Kuznetsova ND; Lukanina LS
    Farmatsiia; 1979; 28(5):44-6. PubMed ID: 39797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. European test methods for rubber closures.
    Brinkhoff O
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1969; 23(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 5807464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Silicate release from glass for pharmaceutical preparations.
    Bohrer D; Bortoluzzi F; Nascimento PC; Carvalho LM; Ramirez AG
    Int J Pharm; 2008 May; 355(1-2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18272302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Research on the relationship between cephalosporin structure, solution clarity, and rubber closure compatibility using volatile components profile of butyl rubber closures.
    Chong XM; Dong X; Yao SC; Hu CQ
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2019 Jan; 45(1):159-167. PubMed ID: 30231654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommended testing methodology for rubber closures.
    Hilty WW
    Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1968; 22(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 5649569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new method for the extraction of soluble aluminum from chlorobutyl rubber closures.
    Mondimore D; Moore C
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1983; 37(3):79-81. PubMed ID: 6875744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-Term Study of Container Closure Integrity of Rubber-Glass Vial Systems by Multiple Methods.
    Gehrmann MR; Mcandrew TP
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2020; 74(1):147-161. PubMed ID: 31420507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On heavy metal ions contamination from ampoule glass.
    Kassem MA; Kassem AA; Ammar HO
    Pharm Acta Helv; 1969 Sep; 44(9):535-40. PubMed ID: 5821943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Panel discussion: impact of changes of rubber formulations. II. Changes in accelerators.
    Greene GE
    J Parenter Drug Assoc; 1978; 32(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 246926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.