These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6707979)

  • 1. The effects of redundant communications on listeners: why different types may have different effects.
    Sonnenschein S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1984 Mar; 13(2):147-66. PubMed ID: 6707979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why young listeners do not benefit from differentiating verbal redundancy.
    Sonnenschein S
    Child Dev; 1984 Jun; 55(3):929-35. PubMed ID: 6734327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attention to stimuli, verbal labeling, and question asking in referential communication.
    Quay LC; Mathews M; Hough R
    J Gen Psychol; 1984 Apr; 110(2d Half):267-74. PubMed ID: 6726205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does drawing attention to the referent constrain the way in which children construct verbal messages?
    Lloyd P; Banham L
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1997 Sep; 26(5):509-18. PubMed ID: 9329204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development of referential communication: speaking to different listeners.
    Sonnenschein S
    Child Dev; 1988 Jun; 59(3):694-702. PubMed ID: 3383678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Fournier LR; Eriksen CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):538-50. PubMed ID: 2144569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linguistic Redundancy and its Effects on Younger and Older Adults' Real-Time Comprehension and Memory.
    Saryazdi R; Nuque J; Chambers CG
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Apr; 46(4):e13123. PubMed ID: 35377508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The social basis of referential communication: Speakers construct physical reference based on listeners' expected visual search.
    Jara-Ettinger J; Rubio-Fernandez P
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Nov; 129(6):1394-1413. PubMed ID: 34968132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation.
    Sedivy JC; Tanenhaus MK; Chambers CG; Carlson GN
    Cognition; 1999 Jun; 71(2):109-47. PubMed ID: 10444906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performative bias in children's interpretations of ambiguous referential communications.
    Ackerman BP
    Child Dev; 1981; 52(4):1224-30. PubMed ID: 7318522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances.
    Indefrey P; Hellwig F; Herzog H; Seitz RJ; Hagoort P
    Brain Lang; 2004 May; 89(2):312-9. PubMed ID: 15068913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of the ability to distinguish communicative intention and literal message meaning.
    Beal CR; Flavell JH
    Child Dev; 1984 Jun; 55(3):920-8. PubMed ID: 6734326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of masker type, sentence context, and listener age on speech recognition performance in 1-back listening tasks.
    Schurman J; Brungart D; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3337. PubMed ID: 25480078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developmental shifts in children's sensitivity to visual speech: a new multimodal picture-word task.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; Spence MJ; Tye-Murray N; Abdi H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jan; 102(1):40-59. PubMed ID: 18829049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual and verbal metaphors: developmental interactions.
    Dent C; Rosenberg L
    Child Dev; 1990 Aug; 61(4):983-94. PubMed ID: 2209201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The development of perceived structure and attention: evidence from divided and selective attention tasks.
    Shepp BE; Barrett SE
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Jun; 51(3):434-58. PubMed ID: 2072086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity to Referential Ambiguity in Discourse: The Role of Attention, Working Memory, and Verbal Ability.
    Boudewyn MA; Long DL; Traxler MJ; Lesh TA; Dave S; Mangun GR; Carter CS; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 27(12):2309-23. PubMed ID: 26401815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.