166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6708811)
21. Prosopagnosia: a double dissociation between the recognition of familiar and unfamiliar faces.
Malone DR; Morris HH; Kay MC; Levin HS
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1982 Sep; 45(9):820-2. PubMed ID: 7131015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Changes in visual field advantage for facial recognition: the development of a general processing strategy.
Turkewitz G; Ross P
Cortex; 1983 Jun; 19(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 6884039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hypnosis and recognition of a face.
Wagstaff GF
Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Dec; 55(3 Pt 1):816-8. PubMed ID: 7162916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise.
Diamond R; Carey S
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1986 Jun; 115(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 2940312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Likability of targets and distractors in facial recognition.
Mueller JH; Heesacker M; Ross MJ
Am J Psychol; 1984; 97(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 6731653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of familiarity on spatial frequency thresholds for face matching.
Watier NN; Collin CA
Perception; 2009; 38(10):1497-507. PubMed ID: 19950481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Recognition memory for faces with and without spectacles.
McKelvie SJ
Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Dec; 65(3):705-6. PubMed ID: 3438114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of changes in visible area on facial recognition.
Inui T; Miyamoto K
Perception; 1984; 13(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 6473051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Benefits for Voice Learning Caused by Concurrent Faces Develop over Time.
Zäske R; Mühl C; Schweinberger SR
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143151. PubMed ID: 26588847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of different types of retrieval cues on the recall of names of famous faces.
Hanley JR; Cowell ES
Mem Cognit; 1988 Nov; 16(6):545-55. PubMed ID: 3193886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The time course of repetition effects for words and unfamiliar faces.
Bentin S; Moscovitch M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Jun; 117(2):148-60. PubMed ID: 2969032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Investigation of a visual imagery mnemonic device for acquiring face--name associations.
McCarty DL
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Mar; 6(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 7373246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Memory for faces: are caricatures better than photographs?
Tversky B; Baratz D
Mem Cognit; 1985 Jan; 13(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 4010513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Iconic memory for elementary visual characteristics: on a poorly accessible visual store and the long-lasting icon].
Schulz T
Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1981-1982; 134(1):1-31. PubMed ID: 7347590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Facilitation of free recall by categorical blocking depends on stimulus type.
Gollin ES; Sharps MJ
Mem Cognit; 1988 Nov; 16(6):539-44. PubMed ID: 3193885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age.
Bartlett JC; Fulton A
Mem Cognit; 1991 May; 19(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 1861609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Configurational information in face perception.
Young AW; Hellawell D; Hay DC
Perception; 1987; 16(6):747-59. PubMed ID: 3454432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: beyond the internal/external feature distinction.
Brooks KR; Kemp RI
Perception; 2007; 36(11):1646-59. PubMed ID: 18265845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The structure of memory: evidence concerning the recall of surface and background color of shapes.
Wilton RN
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Aug; 41(3):579-98. PubMed ID: 2798923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
