These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 670906)

  • 1. An alternative interpretation of the stimulus suffix effect.
    Parkinson SR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1978 Jul; 4(4):362-9. PubMed ID: 670906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
    Huang ST; Glenberg AM
    Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suffix effects and intrusion errors in young and elderly subjects.
    Greenhut-Wertz J; Manning SK
    Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 7628510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
    Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recency and suffix effects in pictures as a function of recall method.
    Manning SK; Schreier H
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 3364617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
    Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of auditory features in memory span for words.
    Drewnowski A; Murdock BB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 May; 6(3):319-32. PubMed ID: 7373250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recency and suffix effects with immediate recall of olfactory stimuli.
    Miles C; Jenkins R
    Memory; 2000 May; 8(3):195-205. PubMed ID: 10889902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli.
    Greene RL; Samuel AG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 2945898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Status of spatial location in auditory sensory memory: evidence from rapidly presented lists.
    Odgers RP; Colle HA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1980 Sep; 6(5):546-57. PubMed ID: 7430969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Immediate and delayed stimulus repetitions evoke different ERPs in a serial-probe recognition task.
    Crites SL; Delgado P; Devine JV; Lozano DI
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov; 37(6):850-8. PubMed ID: 11117465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
    Greene RL
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory versus visual processing of three sets of simultaneous digit pairs.
    Rollins HA; Schurman DL; Evans MJ; Knoph K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1975 Mar; 104(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 1141829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.
    Hughes RW; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Apr; 31(2):316-27. PubMed ID: 15826233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transitional information in spatial serial memory: path characteristics affect recall performance.
    Parmentier FB; Elford G; Mayberry M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):412-27. PubMed ID: 15910128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Cognition; 2009 Jan; 110(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 19081558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory list memory and interference processes in monkeys.
    Wright AA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Jul; 25(3):284-96. PubMed ID: 10423854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonauditory suffix effects in congenitally deaf signers of American Sign Language.
    Shand MA; Klima ES
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1981 Nov; 7(6):464-74. PubMed ID: 7328396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suffix interference in the recall of linguistically coherent speech.
    Balota DA; Cowan N; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 May; 16(3):446-56. PubMed ID: 2140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
    Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.