317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6709368)
1. Clinical inferences and decisions--II. Decision trees, receiver operator curves and subjective probability.
Aspinall P; Hill AR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1984; 4(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 6709368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporating uncertainty into medical decision making: an approach to unexpected test results.
Bianchi MT; Alexander BM; Cash SS
Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 18812583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Bayesian approach to evaluation of diagnostic data.
Scandellari C
Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(3):385-93. PubMed ID: 1809057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.
Proeve M
Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical reasoning about new symptoms despite preexisting disease: sources of error and order effects.
Bergus GR; Chapman GB; Gjerde C; Elstein AS
Fam Med; 1995 May; 27(5):314-20. PubMed ID: 7628652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayes' theorem and diagnostic tests in neuropsychology: interval estimates for post-test probabilities.
Crawford JR; Garthwaite PH; Betkowska K
Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 23(4):624-44. PubMed ID: 19235634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bridging the gap between clinical practice and diagnostic clinical epidemiology: pilot experiences with a didactic model based on a logarithmic scale.
Van den Ende J; Bisoffi Z; Van Puymbroek H; Van der Stuyft P; Van Gompel A; Derese A; Lynen L; Moreira J; Janssen PA
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Jun; 13(3):374-80. PubMed ID: 17518802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A microcomputer program for critical evaluation of diagnostic tests.
Abendroth TW; Bongiovanni MB; Krieg AF
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1986 Oct; 110(10):952-8. PubMed ID: 3767612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there a star tree paradox?
Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Oct; 23(10):1819-23. PubMed ID: 16837562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling the clinical assessment of men with suspected obstructed voiding using Bayes' Theorem.
Caffarel J; Griffiths C; Pickard R; Robson W; Drinnan M
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):797-801. PubMed ID: 18508333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical inferences and decisions--I. Diagnosis and Bayes' theorem.
Aspinall P; Hill AR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1983; 3(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 6646764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses.
Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Sep; 24(9):2108-18. PubMed ID: 17636043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. We only see what we already know--a modified Bayes' formula to explain inherent limitations of diagnostic tests.
Sonnenberg A
Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 15325029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Probabilistic reporting of EUS-FNA cytology: Toward improved communication and better clinical decisions.
Eltoum IA; Chen VK; Chhieng DC; Jhala D; Jhala NC; Crowe R; Varadarajulu S; Eloubeidi MA
Cancer; 2006 Apr; 108(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 16444743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The decision theory of paternity disputes: optimization considerations applied to multilocus DNA fingerprinting.
Krawczak M; Schmidtke J
J Forensic Sci; 1992 Nov; 37(6):1525-33. PubMed ID: 1453166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Assessing diagnostic possibilities using the sensitivity of findings].
Döring D
Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1989 May; 44(9):264-7. PubMed ID: 2741522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical inferences and decisions--III. Utility assessment and the Bayesian decision model.
Aspinall PA; Hill AR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1984; 4(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 6472855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decision analysis applied to pharmacy practice.
Einarson TR; McGhan WF; Bootman JL
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1985 Feb; 42(2):364-71. PubMed ID: 3919578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A bayesian approach to the design of phase II clinical trials.
Sylvester RJ
Biometrics; 1988 Sep; 44(3):823-36. PubMed ID: 3203131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian clinical reasoning: does intuitive estimation of likelihood ratios on an ordinal scale outperform estimation of sensitivities and specificities?
Moreira J; Bisoffi Z; Narváez A; Van den Ende J
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):934-40. PubMed ID: 19018928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
