These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6709703)

  • 1. The computation of scatter in mammography by Monte Carlo methods.
    Dance DR; Day GJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Mar; 29(3):237-47. PubMed ID: 6709703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements.
    Leon SM; Brateman LF; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111914. PubMed ID: 25370647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo simulation of a mammographic test phantom.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Pachoud M; Alm Carlsson G; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Verdun FR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):432-5. PubMed ID: 15933151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of scatter-to-primary ratio, grid performance and normalized average glandular dose in mammography by Monte Carlo simulation including interference and energy broadening effects.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(15):4335-59. PubMed ID: 20647608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acuros CTS: A fast, linear Boltzmann transport equation solver for computed tomography scatter - Part I: Core algorithms and validation.
    Maslowski A; Wang A; Sun M; Wareing T; Davis I; Star-Lack J
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):1899-1913. PubMed ID: 29509970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation.
    Boone JM; Cooper VN
    Med Phys; 2000 Aug; 27(8):1818-31. PubMed ID: 10984229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography.
    Jing Z; Huda W; Walker JK
    Med Phys; 1998 Jul; 25(7 Pt 1):1111-7. PubMed ID: 9682196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scatter dose calculation for anti-scatter linear grids in mammography.
    Al Kafi MA; Maalej N; Naqvi AA
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Oct; 67(10):1837-41. PubMed ID: 19632851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation.
    Hunt RA; Dance DR; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):395-8. PubMed ID: 15933144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A scatter correction method for dual-energy digital mammography: Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ai K; Gao Y; Yu G
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2014; 22(5):653-71. PubMed ID: 25265925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental and theoretical energy and angular dependencies of scattered radiation in the mammography energy range.
    Klein DJ; Chan HP; Muntz EP; Doi K; Lee K; Chopelas P; Bernstein H; Lee J
    Med Phys; 1983; 10(5):664-8. PubMed ID: 6646072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital mammography image simulation using Monte Carlo.
    Peplow DE; Verghese K
    Med Phys; 2000 Mar; 27(3):568-79. PubMed ID: 10757608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental verification of a technique for predicting scattered radiation transfer: application to low photon energies.
    Bernstein H; Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(6):836-42. PubMed ID: 3796480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. X-ray scatter in megavoltage transmission radiography: physical characteristics and influence on image quality.
    Jaffray DA; Battista JJ; Fenster A; Munro P
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 8164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scatter rejection by air gaps in diagnostic radiology. Calculations using a Monte Carlo collision density method and consideration of molecular interference in coherent scattering.
    Persliden J; Carlsson GA
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jan; 42(1):155-75. PubMed ID: 9015816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compact x-ray sources for mammographic applications: Monte Carlo simulations of image quality.
    Oliva P; Golosio B; Stumbo S; Bravin A; Tomassini P
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5149-61. PubMed ID: 19994525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Calculation of dose and contrast for two mammographic grids.
    Dance DR; Persliden J; Carlsson GA
    Phys Med Biol; 1992 Jan; 37(1):235-48. PubMed ID: 1741427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PSF, LSF and S/P in mammography: GEANT4 validation.
    Grabski V; Brandan ME; Ruiz-Trejo C; Villaseñor Y
    Z Med Phys; 2006; 16(4):298-306. PubMed ID: 17216755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validity of Monte Carlo simulation in studies of scattered radiation in diagnostic radiology.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Feb; 28(2):109-29. PubMed ID: 6867102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.