These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6712516)

  • 1. Effect of peripheral hearing loss on the masking level difference.
    Jerger J; Brown D; Smith S
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1984 May; 110(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 6712516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Time factor in the effect of sound lateralization in various forms of hearing loss].
    Belov IM; Mal'tseva NV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1987; (1):26-30. PubMed ID: 3564257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of conductive hearing loss and middle ear surgery on binaural hearing.
    Hall JW; Derlacki EL
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986; 95(5 Pt 1):525-30. PubMed ID: 3767223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal study of hearing-disabled children. A follow-up investigation.
    Parving A
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1988 Sep; 15(3):233-44. PubMed ID: 3192361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tone-on-tone masking in subjects with normal hearing and with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Chung DY
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Dec; 24(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 7329047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of the Conductive Component of Hearing Loss on Speech Discrimination Ability.
    Kurioka T; Sano H; Furuki S; Yamashita T
    J Int Adv Otol; 2020 Apr; 16(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 32209519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Patterns of auditory nerve and brainstem-evoked responses (ABR) in different types of peripheral hearing loss.
    Chisin R; Gafni M; Sohmer H
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1983; 237(2):165-73. PubMed ID: 6847516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple auditory steady state response thresholds to bone conduction stimuli in adults with normal and elevated thresholds.
    Ishida IM; Cuthbert BP; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 21206364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone-conduction masking for threshold assessment in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Webb KC; Greenberg HJ
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 6628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical applications of selected binaural effects.
    Noffsinger D
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():157-65. PubMed ID: 6955923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Relation between pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in various hearing-impaired listeners].
    He LP
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 1993; 28(1):29-31, 59. PubMed ID: 8352994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inherited low-frequency hearing loss. A new mixed conductive/sensorineural entity?
    Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 6719015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A controlled comparison of auditory steady-state responses and pure-tone audiometry in patients with hearing loss.
    Wadhera R; Hernot S; Gulati SP; Kalra V
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017; 96(10-11):E47-E52. PubMed ID: 29121385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG; Miyamoto RT
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further interpretation of the threshold of octave masking (TOM) test.
    Olsen CC; Berry GA
    Scand Audiol; 1979; 8(4):217-33. PubMed ID: 531475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative data on a study of sound lateralization in peripheral impairments of the acoustic analyzer].
    Ryndina AM; Grechukhina TV; Zlatina VZ
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1978; (6):15-8. PubMed ID: 716103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency resolution and hearing loss.
    Tyler RS; Wood EJ; Fernandes M
    Br J Audiol; 1982 Feb; 16(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 7055654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing the masking level difference in cochlear hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Hall JW; Tyler RS; Fernandes MA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 6717000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Audiometric characteristics of a Dutch family with Muckle-Wells syndrome.
    Weegerink NJ; Schraders M; Leijendeckers J; Slieker K; Huygen PL; Hoefsloot L; Oostrik J; Pennings RJ; Simon A; Snik A; Kremer H; Kunst HP
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):243-51. PubMed ID: 21810457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.