These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6713106)

  • 21. The constitutional right to refuse antipsychotic medications.
    Brooks AD
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(2):179-221. PubMed ID: 6114763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Community mental health treatment for the mentally ill -- when does less restrictive treatment become a right?
    Seicshnaydre SE
    Tulane Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 66(6):1971-2001. PubMed ID: 11660060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients.
    Blais NR
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1975; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The rights of the mentally ill under state constitutions.
    Meisel A
    Law Contemp Probl; 1982; 45(3):7-40. PubMed ID: 11645495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Massachusetts district court affirms the right to refuse psychotropic drugs, seclusion.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Mar; 31(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 7353854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty.
    Cooper GG
    Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prison inmates and consent to treatment: problems and issues.
    Veneziano CA
    Law Psychol Rev; 1986; 10():129-46. PubMed ID: 11659775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Are the rights of people with mental illness still important?
    Wilk RJ
    Soc Work; 1994 Mar; 39(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 8153759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Advance directives in a correctional setting.
    Thomas DL; Watson JM
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1998 Sep; 4(3):878-99. PubMed ID: 12455557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The right to treatment case--that wasn't.
    Mancilla J
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1976; 30(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 11664663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Guaranteeing the right to treatment.
    Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
    Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Substantive due process limits on the duration of civil commitment for the treatment of mental illness.
    Burgett DW
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):205-64. PubMed ID: 11650560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law.
    Wade MD
    Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The right to refuse psychotropic medications.
    Gallant DM; Irwin M
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1983; 139():31-8. PubMed ID: 6669546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes".
    McGovern JJ
    New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The right of mentally ill patients in South Africa to refuse treatment.
    Allan A; Allan M
    S Afr Law J; 1997; 114(Pt. 4):724-37. PubMed ID: 11660580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patients' rights vs. patients' needs: the right of the mentally ill to refuse treatment in Colorado.
    Shavill NL
    Denver Law J; 1981; 58(3):567-608. PubMed ID: 11662885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.