These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6713537)

  • 1. Guidelines for radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Judkins MP
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1984; 10(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 6713537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation exposure and protection in cardiac catheterization laboratories.
    Miller SW; Castronovo FP
    Am J Cardiol; 1985 Jan; 55(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 3966378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of radiation doses to personnel in a cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    McKetty MH
    Health Phys; 1996 Apr; 70(4):563-7. PubMed ID: 8617599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol.
    Wassef AW; Hiebert B; Ravandi A; Ducas J; Minhas K; Vo M; Kass M; Parmar G; Hussain F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 24746655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.
    Nakamura S; Kobayashi T; Funatsu A; Okada T; Mauti M; Waizumi Y; Yamada S
    Heart Vessels; 2016 May; 31(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 25840815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of pulsed progressive fluoroscopy on reduction of radiation dose in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Holmes DR; Wondrow MA; Gray JE; Vetter RJ; Fellows JL; Julsrud PR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 15(1):159-62. PubMed ID: 2295727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The ALARA concept in pediatric cardiac catheterization: techniques and tactics for managing radiation dose.
    Justino H
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):146-53. PubMed ID: 16862415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Achievable radiation reduction during pediatric cardiac catheterization: How low can we go?
    Borik S; Devadas S; Mroczek D; Lee KJ; Chaturvedi R; Benson LN
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):841-8. PubMed ID: 26011560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Staying Safe from Radiation Exposure in Cath Lab: A Review.
    Pasha K; Khan HR; Sumon AA
    Mymensingh Med J; 2018 Apr; 27(2):437-439. PubMed ID: 29769516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation-reducing planning of cardiac catheterisation.
    Kuon E; Dahm JB; Robinson DM; Empen K; Günther M; Wucherer W
    Z Kardiol; 2005 Oct; 94(10):663-73. PubMed ID: 16200481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation Reduction in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory Using a Novel Imaging System.
    Manu S; Suntharos P; Boyle GJ; Wang L; Prieto LR
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 29035845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures.
    Cusma JT; Bell MR; Wondrow MA; Taubel JP; Holmes DR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 33(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 9973023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology.
    Durán A; Hian SK; Miller DL; Le Heron J; Padovani R; Vano E
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 23475846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Agarwal S; Parashar A; Bajaj NS; Khan I; Ahmad I; Heupler FA; Bunte M; Modi DK; Tuzcu EM; Kapadia SR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):558-66. PubMed ID: 24746652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Radiologic practice and radioprotection in Italian hemodynamic laboratories].
    Steffenino G; Ribichini F; Dellavalle A; Rossetti V; Cerati R; Garbarino M; Russo P; Uslenghi E
    Cardiologia; 1996 Jan; 41(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8697469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. X-ray angiography systems.
    Health Devices; 1993 Nov; 22(11):507-54. PubMed ID: 8119801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of radiation dose between different fluoroscopy systems in the modern catheterization laboratory: Results from bench testing using an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Christopoulos G; Christakopoulos GE; Rangan BV; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Latif F; Abu-Fadel M; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 26010374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study.
    Liu H; Jin Z; Jing L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24162374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does the use of new intracoronary interventional devices prolong radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory?
    Federman J; Bell MR; Wondrow MA; Grill DE; Holmes DR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 8294685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Secondary ionizing radiation generated by digital and analog coronary cineangiographic equipment: influence of external systems of radiologic protection].
    Ramírez A; Farias E; Silva AM; Oyarzún C; Leyton F; Ugalde H; Dussaillant G; Cumsille MA
    Rev Med Chil; 2000 Aug; 128(8):853-62. PubMed ID: 11129546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.