These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6713791)

  • 41. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H; Mayer R
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparison of iopamidol and iohexol in peripheral angiography.
    Fletcher EW
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Nov; 57(683):1043-4. PubMed ID: 6535621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Intravenous pyelography in children comparative study: ioxitalamates - ioxaglates (author's transl)].
    Montagne JP; Fauré C
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1982 Mar; 25(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 7092111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Comparative study of 2 contrast media with low osmolarity in pediatric angiocardiography].
    Hoeffel JC; Donze B; Worms AM; Lostette Y
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1983 Dec; 26(8 Pt 2):712-3. PubMed ID: 6367613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A large trial of intravenous Conray 325 and Niopam 300 to assess immediate and delayed reactions.
    McCullough M; Davies P; Richardson R
    Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):260-5. PubMed ID: 2649192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Iohexol in excretory urography. Results of drug monitoring].
    Schrott KM; Behrends B; Clauss W; Kaufmann J; Lehnert J
    Fortschr Med; 1986 Feb; 104(7):153-6. PubMed ID: 3516817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of contrast media on femoral blood flow. Comparison between non-ionic and ionic monomeric and monoacidic dimeric contrast media in the dog.
    Nyman U; Almén T; Landtman M
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():41-8. PubMed ID: 6267892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical trials in adults.
    Mathias K; Seemann W
    Radiol Med; 1986 Jun; 72(6 Suppl 1):44-6. PubMed ID: 3523640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Formulation and clinical introduction of low osmolality contrast media.
    Grainger RG
    Radiologe; 1981 Jun; 21(6):261-7. PubMed ID: 7268025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Comparison of patient responses to high- and low-osmolality contrast agents injected intravenously.
    Bagg MN; Horwitz TA; Bester L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 3487214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effects of contrast media on aortic endothelium. Experiments in the rat with non-ionic monomeric and monoacidic dimeric contrast media.
    Nyman U; Almén T
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1980; 362():65-71. PubMed ID: 6168170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Contrast media and bronchospasm: a study with iopamidol.
    Dawson P; Pitfield J; Britton J
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Mar; 34(2):227-30. PubMed ID: 6825405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Iotrol, a new myelographic agent: 1. Radiography, CT, CSF clearance, and brain penetration.
    Kerber CW; Sovak M; Ranganathan RS; Heilman CB
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1983; 4(3):317-8. PubMed ID: 6410732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in selective renovasography].
    Porst H; Mayer R; Clauss W
    Urologe A; 1986 Mar; 25(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 3521047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Image quality and safety after iodixanol in intravenous urography; a comparison with iohexol.
    Sundgren PC; Bååth L; Törnquist C; Hougens Grynne B; Kjaersgaard P; Almén T
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Aug; 69(824):699-703. PubMed ID: 8949670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Ventilatory function during urography: a comparison of iopamidol and sodium iothalamate.
    Wilson AR; Davies P
    Clin Radiol; 1988 Sep; 39(5):490-3. PubMed ID: 3180669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The new low-osmolar contrast media: a simple guide.
    Dawson P; Grainger RG; Pitfield J
    Clin Radiol; 1983 Mar; 34(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 6337766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V; Heep H; Clauss W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E; Federighi F; Ghio R; Marchitiello M; Galigani P; Palla R
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.