These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6717003)

  • 1. Magnitude estimation of loudness. I: Application to hearing aid selection.
    Geller D; Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 6717003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: II. Hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Stone MA; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Jun; 33(3):157-70. PubMed ID: 10439142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between pure-tone and speech loudness discomfort levels among hearing-impaired subjects.
    Beattie RC; Boyd RL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1986 May; 51(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 3702359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preferred listening levels for bands of speech in relation to hearing aid selection.
    Christen R; Byrne D
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7444317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting: III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Stone MA
    Br J Audiol; 1999 Aug; 33(4):241-58. PubMed ID: 10509859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Various uncomfortable loudness thresholds, their correlation and use in general practice].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Nov; 71(11):572-5. PubMed ID: 1463566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnitude estimation of loudness. III: Performance of selected hearing aid users.
    Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):411-20. PubMed ID: 4046582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of clinical and real-life judgments of loudness discomfort.
    Filion PR; Margolis RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 May; 3(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 1581594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability of most comfortable and uncomfortable loudness levels to speech stimuli in the hearing impaired.
    Sammeth CA; Birman M; Hecox KE
    Ear Hear; 1989 Apr; 10(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 2707507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid saturation and aided loudness discomfort.
    Fortune TW; Preves DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Feb; 35(1):175-85. PubMed ID: 1531242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loudness discomfort levels and saturation levels in hearing aids prescribed for young persons.
    Israelsson B; Sandh A; Leijon A
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 8750755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of a loudness model for hearing-aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1998 Oct; 32(5):317-35. PubMed ID: 9845030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired.
    Hawkins DB; Prosek RA; Walden BE; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3560897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Loudness scaling. A procedure for quantitative recruitment detection].
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Wagner I
    HNO; 1994 Jun; 42(6):350-7. PubMed ID: 8071095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.
    Kamm C; Dirks DD; Mickey MR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):668-81. PubMed ID: 745368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships among speech threshold, loudness discomfort, comfortable loudness, and PB max in the elderly hearing impaired.
    Beattie RC; Warren VG
    Am J Otol; 1982 Apr; 3(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7081412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnitude estimation of loudness. II: Loudness perception in presbycusic listeners.
    Knight KK; Margolis RH
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 6717004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of test signal type and bandwidth on the categorical scaling of loudness.
    Ricketts TA; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Apr; 99(4 Pt 1):2281-7. PubMed ID: 8730074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.