These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6717005)

  • 1. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise.
    Bilger RC; Nuetzel JM; Rabinowitz WM; Rzeczkowski C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):32-48. PubMed ID: 6717005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. List equivalency and test-retest reliability of the Speech in Noise test.
    Bentler RA
    Am J Audiol; 2000 Dec; 9(2):84-100. PubMed ID: 11200196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychometric functions for the CID W-22 and NU Auditory Test No. 6. Materials spoken by the same speaker.
    Wilson RH; Oyler AL
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 9360866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the speech perception in noise (SPIN) test.
    Hutcherson RW; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg (1979); 1979; 87(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 503495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Morgan DE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 6747116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiovisual asynchrony detection and speech intelligibility in noise with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Başkent D; Bazo D
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 21389856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; Horwitz AR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 45(6):1297-310. PubMed ID: 12546495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Suggestions for optimizing reliability with the synthetic sentence identification test.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 Feb; 48(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 6621001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Killion MC; Niquette PA; Gudmundsen GI; Revit LJ; Banerjee S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2395-405. PubMed ID: 15532670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners With Normal Hearing and Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle RA; Smith SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 17675590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra- and inter-session test, retest reliability of the Words-in-Noise (WIN) test.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007; 18(10):813-25. PubMed ID: 18496992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
    Bacon SP; Opie JM; Montoya DY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1998 Jun; 41(3):549-63. PubMed ID: 9638921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of compression ratio on speech recognition and speech-quality ratings with wide dynamic range compression amplification.
    Boike KT; Souza PE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):456-68. PubMed ID: 10757696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility.
    Humes LE; Roberts L
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Dec; 33(4):726-35. PubMed ID: 2273886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.