These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6717007)

  • 1. Lombard and sidetone amplification effects in normal and misarticulating children.
    Siegel GM; Kennard KL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Mar; 27(1):56-62. PubMed ID: 6717007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of selected masking noises on Lombard and sidetone amplification effects.
    Garber SF; Siegel GM; Pick HL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Sep; 19(3):523-35. PubMed ID: 979214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory stimulation, rhythm, and stuttering.
    Martin RR; Johnson LJ; Siegel GM; Haroldson SK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 4087883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intensity of guitar playing as a function of auditory feedback.
    Johnson CI; Pick HL; Garber SR; Siegel GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jun; 63(6):1930. PubMed ID: 681625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sidetone amplification, noise, and stuttering.
    Martin RR; Siegel GM; Johnson LJ; Haroldson SK
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 6521457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of auditory masking to estimate automatization of correct articulatory production.
    Manning WH; Keappock NE; Stick SL
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 May; 41(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 1271777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Misarticulating and normally articulating children's identification and discrimination of synthetic [r] and [w].
    Hoffman PR; Daniloff RG; Bengoa D; Schuckers GH
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Feb; 50(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 3974212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.
    Lee J; Ali H; Ziaei A; Tobey EA; Hansen JHL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2788. PubMed ID: 28464686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Sidetone Amplification on Vocal Function During Telecommunication.
    Tomassi NE; Castro ME; Timmons Sund L; Díaz-Cádiz ME; Buckley DP; Stepp CE
    J Voice; 2023 Jul; 37(4):553-560. PubMed ID: 33992477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of sidetone amplification effect in vocal intensity.
    Chang-Yit R; Pick HL; Siegel GM
    J Commun Disord; 1975 Dec; 8(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 802981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification and description of homogeneous subgroups within a sample of misarticulating children.
    Arndt WB; Shelton RL; Johnson AF; Furr ML
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Jun; 20(2):263-92. PubMed ID: 895098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of perilaryngeal vibration on the self-perception of loudness and the Lombard effect.
    Brajot FX; Nguyen D; DiGiovanni J; Gracco VL
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jun; 236(6):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 29623381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual categorization and consistency of synthesized (r-w) continua by adults, normal children and (r)-misarticulating children.
    Ohde RN; Sharf DJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):556-68. PubMed ID: 2976438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An N-of-1 Randomized Controlled Trial of Interventions for Children With Inconsistent Speech Sound Errors.
    Rvachew S; Matthews T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 62(9):3183-3203. PubMed ID: 31479383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple-phoneme-misarticulating children's perception and production of voice onset time.
    Hoffman PR; Daniloff RG; Alfonso PJ; Schuckers GH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Apr; 58(2):603-10. PubMed ID: 6739251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct neural systems recruited when speech production is modulated by different masking sounds.
    Meekings S; Evans S; Lavan N; Boebinger D; Krieger-Redwood K; Cooke M; Scott SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):8. PubMed ID: 27475128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception and production of the final /s-ts/ contrast in Dutch by misarticulating children.
    Raaymakers EM; Crul TA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Aug; 53(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 3398480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between masking levels and phonatory stability in normal-speaking women.
    Ferrand CT
    J Voice; 2006 Jun; 20(2):223-8. PubMed ID: 16157468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice parameters in children with Down syndrome.
    Moura CP; Cunha LM; Vilarinho H; Cunha MJ; Freitas D; Palha M; Pueschel SM; Pais-Clemente M
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 17014985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.