These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6717012)

  • 21. Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1199-202. PubMed ID: 3571732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Villchur revisited: another look at automatic gain control simulation of recruiting hearing loss.
    Duchnowski P; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3170-81. PubMed ID: 8550941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tone in Thai alaryngeal speech.
    Gandour J; Weinberg B; Petty SH; Dardarananda R
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1988 Feb; 53(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 3339865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Frequency selectivity and consonant intelligibility in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Preminger J; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 4010249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consonant confusions in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bilger RC; Wang MD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Dec; 19(4):718-48. PubMed ID: 1003952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relation between identification and discrimination of vowels in young and elderly listeners.
    Coughlin M; Kewley-Port D; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec; 104(6):3597-607. PubMed ID: 9857518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nábĕlek AK; Czyzewski Z; Krishnan LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1228-46. PubMed ID: 1401512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Temporal intraspeech masking of plosive bursts: effects of hearing loss and frequency shaping.
    Mackersie CL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 50(3):554-63. PubMed ID: 17538099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consonant recognition and confusion patterns among elderly hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gordon-Salant S
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 3678640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of relative amplitude, presentation level, and vowel duration on perception of voiceless stop consonants by normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hedrick MS; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3398-407. PubMed ID: 8914319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Recognition performance on words interrupted (10 ips, 50% duty cycle) with two interruption patterns referenced to word onset: Young listeners with normal hearing for pure tones and older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; Irish SE
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54(12):933-41. PubMed ID: 26252182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phonemic restoration in sensorineural hearing loss does not depend on baseline speech perception scores.
    Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):EL169-74. PubMed ID: 20968321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparing normal hearing and hearing-impaired subject's performance on the Northwestern Auditory Test Number 6, California Consonant Test, and Pascoe's High-Frequency Word Test.
    Maroonroge S; Diefendorf AO
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):356-60. PubMed ID: 6510582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phonemic restoration by hearing-impaired listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Başkent D; Eiler CL; Edwards B
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):54-62. PubMed ID: 19922784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consonant-recognition patterns and self-assessment of hearing handicap.
    Hustedde CG; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1397-409. PubMed ID: 1787721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contribution of spectral cues to mandarin lexical tone recognition in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired Mandarin Chinese speakers.
    Wang S; Mannell R; Newall P; Han D
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 20625301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense-syllable Test. II. Syllable recognition and consonant confusion patterns.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD; Langhofer LR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 7087417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS; Younger MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Double-vowel perception in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: differences in fundamental frequency, ear of presentation, and relative amplitude.
    Arehart KH; Rossi-Katz J; Swensson-Prutsman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 48(1):236-52. PubMed ID: 15938067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.