311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6717876)
1. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
Day NE
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Icelandic and Nordic cervical screening programs: trends in incidence and mortality rates through 1995.
Sigurdsson K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Jul; 78(6):478-85. PubMed ID: 10376856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
Louhivuori K
Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 1782637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
Hakama M; Louhivuori K
Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The significance of organized screening for uterine cervix cancer in Denmark during 1968-1987].
Lynge E; Engholm G; Madsen M
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1330-4. PubMed ID: 1598705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical cancer in Croatia: state of the art and possibilities for prevention.
Znaor A; Strnad M
Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():37-40. PubMed ID: 17598503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri.
Nieminen P; Kallio M; Hakama M
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):1017-21. PubMed ID: 7770247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of organized screening on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Denmark.
Lynge E; Madsen M; Engholm G
Cancer Res; 1989 Apr; 49(8):2157-60. PubMed ID: 2702657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Mass screening and the incidence of cervical cancer in the Scandinavian countries].
Hakama M
Duodecim; 1981; 97(6):318-25. PubMed ID: 7274103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Potential contribution of screening to cancer mortality reduction.
Hakama M
Cancer Detect Prev; 1993; 17(4-5):513-20. PubMed ID: 8242651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mass screenings for cervical cancer in Finland 1963-71. Organization, extent, and epidemiological implications.
Hakama M; Joutsenlahti U; Virtanen A; Räsänen-Virtanen U
Ann Clin Res; 1975 Apr; 7(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 1181974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of self-reported cervical cancer screening and impact on cervical cancer mortality in Austria.
Vutuc C; Haidinger G; Waldhoer T; Ahmad F; Breitenecker G
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 May; 111(9):354-9. PubMed ID: 10407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in Alberta.
Starreveld AA; Hill GB; Brown LB; Koch M
Can Med Assoc J; 1981 Nov; 125(10):1105-9. PubMed ID: 7326641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What happens when organization of cervical cancer screening is delayed or stopped?
Lynge E; Clausen LB; Guignard R; Poll P
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16569305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in cancer of the cervix uteri in Sweden following cytological screening.
Bergström R; Sparén P; Adami HO
Br J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 81(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 10487628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Status of preventive examinations against uterine cervix cancer in Denmark].
Lynge E; Arffmann E; Hansen KC; Henriksen B; Holten IW; Hølund B; Jespersen NB; Lindsø R; Olesen F; Poll P
Ugeskr Laeger; 1992 May; 154(19):1339-42. PubMed ID: 1598707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women.
Aklimunnessa K; Mori M; Khan MM; Sakauchi F; Kubo T; Fujino Y; Suzuki S; Tokudome S; Tamakoshi A; ; Motohashi Y; Tsuji I; Nakamura Y; Iso H; Mikami H; Inaba Y; Hoshiyama Y; Suzuki H; Shimizu H; Toyoshima H; Wakai K; Ito Y; Hashimoto S; Kikuchi S; Koizumi A; Kawamura T; Watanabe Y; Miki T; Date C; Sakata K; Nose T; Hayakawa N; Yoshimura T; Shibata A; Okamoto N; Shino H; Ohno Y; Kitagawa T; Kuroki T; Tajima K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 36(8):511-8. PubMed ID: 16844732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Progress in the early detection of cervix cancer from the viewpoint of the Saarland cancer register].
Brenner H; Wiebelt H; Ziegler H
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Apr; 50(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 2358181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
