These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6717919)

  • 1. A comparison of Goldmann, Fieldmaster 200, and Dicon AP2000 perimeters used in a screening mode.
    Mills RP
    Ophthalmology; 1984 Apr; 91(4):347-54. PubMed ID: 6717919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison of visual field testing with a new automated perimeter, the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and the Goldmann perimeter.
    Beck RW; Bergstrom TJ; Lichter PR
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jan; 92(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 3974997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Threshold equivalence between perimeters.
    Anderson DR; Feuer WJ; Alward WL; Skuta GL
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1989 May; 107(5):493-505. PubMed ID: 2712132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of the Autofield-I, CFA-120, and Fieldmaster Model 101-PR automated perimeters.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL
    Ophthalmology; 1980 Aug; 87(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 7443210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of Fieldmaster automated perimeter for the detection of early visual field changes in glaucoma.
    Hong C; Kitazawa Y; Shirato S
    Int Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 7068332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computerized visual field screening in the management of patients with ocular hypertension.
    Dyster-Aas K; Heijl A; Lundgvist L
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1980 Dec; 58(6):918-928. PubMed ID: 7331777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical experience with the Fieldmaster perimeter.
    Bobrow JC; Drews RC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1982 Feb; 93(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 7065096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.
    Bass SJ; Feldman J
    Optometry; 2000 Oct; 71(10):643-52. PubMed ID: 11063269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative office perimetry.
    Keltner JL; Johnson CA; Lewis RA
    Ophthalmology; 1985 Jul; 92(7):862-72. PubMed ID: 4022569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical comparison of three computerized automatic perimeters in the detection of glaucoma defects.
    Heijl A; Drance SM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 May; 99(5):832-6. PubMed ID: 7236085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective comparison of office perimetry.
    Davis RL; Davis RM
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1987 Jan; 58(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 3819290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibration of the Dicon Auto Perimeter 2000 compared with that of the Goldmann perimeter.
    Hart WM; Gordon MO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 96(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 6660263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of diagnostic performance and fixation control of two automated perimeters.
    Asman P; Fingeret M
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1997 Dec; 68(12):763-8. PubMed ID: 9635382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma.
    Sample PA; Bosworth CF; Blumenthal EZ; Girkin C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New quantitative perimetric tests designed to evaluate receptive- field-like properties in diseases of the retina and the optic nerve.
    Enoch JM; Campos EC
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1980; 20(1):83-133. PubMed ID: 6995380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suprathreshold static perimetry in glaucoma and other optic nerve disease.
    Johnson CA; Keltner JL; Balestrery FG
    Ophthalmology; 1979 Jul; 86(7):1278-86. PubMed ID: 233860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Matched comparison of Goldmann perimetry and automated two-zone suprathreshold Dicon perimetry in open-angle glaucoma.
    Levy NS; Ellis E
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1985 Apr; 17(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 4004003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microperimetry--comparison between the micro perimeter 1 and scanning laser ophthalmoscope--fundus perimetry.
    Rohrschneider K; Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):125-34. PubMed ID: 15672526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The efficacy of the dicon screening field to detect eyes with glaucomatous field loss by Humphrey threshold testing.
    Huang AS; Smith SD; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 1998 Jun; 7(3):158-64. PubMed ID: 9627854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.