187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6719016)
1. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
Hagerman B
Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 6719016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
Hagerman B
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
Smoorenburg GF
J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlations between self-assessed hearing handicap and standard audiometric tests in elderly persons.
Pedersen K; Rosenhall U
Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(2):109-16. PubMed ID: 1842275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech-reception threshold in noise for hearing-impaired listeners in conditions with a varying amplitude-frequency response.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():202-6. PubMed ID: 2356728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical evaluation and test-retest reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test.
Summerfield Q; Palmer AR; Foster JR; Marshall DH; Twomey T
Br J Audiol; 1994 Jun; 28(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 7841901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of varying the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences for hearing-impaired listeners.
van Dijkhuizen JN; Festen JM; Plomp R
J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):621-8. PubMed ID: 2768675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning effect when using the Danish Hagerman sentences (Dantale II) to determine speech reception threshold.
Hernvig LH; Olsen SO
Int J Audiol; 2005 Sep; 44(9):509-12. PubMed ID: 16238181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The AMA method of estimation of hearing disability: a validation study.
Dobie RA
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):732-40. PubMed ID: 21694598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The digits-in-noise test: assessing auditory speech recognition abilities in noise.
Smits C; Theo Goverts S; Festen JM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1693-706. PubMed ID: 23464039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning effect observed for the speech reception threshold in interrupted noise with normal hearing listeners.
Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2008 Apr; 47(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 18389414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interlist equivalency of the CID W-22 word lists presented in quiet and in noise.
Loven FC; Hawkins DB
Ear Hear; 1983; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 6840418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the Farsi Hearing in Noise Test.
Darouie A; Zamiri Abdollahi F; Joulaie M; Nik Nezhad S; Ahmadi T; Soli S
Int J Audiol; 2020 Feb; 59(2):148-152. PubMed ID: 31560226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech recognition threshold in slightly and fully modulated noise for hearing-impaired subjects.
Hagerman B
Int J Audiol; 2002 Sep; 41(6):321-9. PubMed ID: 12353604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noise-induced hearing loss and the comprehension of speech in noise.
Quist-Hanssen S; Thorud E; Aasand G
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1979; 360():90-5. PubMed ID: 287364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
