These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6719016)

  • 21. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.
    MacLeod A; Summerfield Q
    Br J Audiol; 1990 Feb; 24(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 2317599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. II. Correlation analysis.
    Divenyi PL; Haupt KM
    Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):100-13. PubMed ID: 9099559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 7178810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise.
    Ozimek E; Warzybok A; Kutzner D
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):444-54. PubMed ID: 20482292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Acclimatization effect in speech recognition: evaluation without hearing aids.
    Santos SN; Petry T; Costa MJ
    Pro Fono; 2010; 22(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 21271114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE; Warzybok A; Hochmuth S; Visentin C; Astolfi A; Prodi N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparing two methods of preschool and kindergarten hearing screening.
    Hamill B
    J Sch Health; 1988 Mar; 58(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 3352234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Hearing Loss and Speech Recognition in the Elderly].
    von Gablenz P; Holube I
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2017 Nov; 96(11):759-764. PubMed ID: 29132188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Predicting speech discrimination from the audiometric thresholds.
    Yoshioka P; Thornton AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1980 Dec; 23(4):814-27. PubMed ID: 7442214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.
    Plomp R; Mimpen AM
    Audiology; 1979; 18(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 760724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired.
    Plomp R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 3724108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Göttingen sentence in noise for different audiogram classes].
    Thiele C; Sukowksi H; Lenarz T; Lesinski-Schiedat A
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Dec; 91(12):782-8. PubMed ID: 22234848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing threshold levels and speech recognition in noise in 7-year-olds.
    Blandy S; Lutman M
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Aug; 44(8):435-43. PubMed ID: 16149238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment.
    Bosman AJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiology; 1995; 34(5):260-84. PubMed ID: 8837785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reading Behind the Lines: The Factors Affecting the Text Reception Threshold in Hearing Aid Users.
    Zekveld AA; Pronk M; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):762-775. PubMed ID: 29450534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.
    Zekveld AA; Rudner M; Johnsrude IS; Festen JM; van Beek JH; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21826004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A method to establish the effect of the hearing aid in noise using Victoreen signal threshold and speech discrimination.
    Lindström B; Svärd I; Bredberg G; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():45-55. PubMed ID: 6577574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.