These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6719016)

  • 41. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M; Foo C; Rönnberg J; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Acoustic neuroma: deterioration of speech discrimination related to thresholds in pure-tone audiometry.
    Van Dijk JE; Duijndam J; Graamans K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Aug; 120(5):627-32. PubMed ID: 11039874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Pure tone audiograms from hearing-impaired children. II. Predicting speech-hearing from the audiogram.
    Bamford JM; Wilson IM; Atkinson D; Bench J
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Feb; 15(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 7214068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Mejia J; Nguyen CV
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):795-800. PubMed ID: 23957444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise.
    Hagerman B; Kinnefors C
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 7761803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dynamic relation between working memory capacity and speech recognition in noise during the first 6 months of hearing aid use.
    Ng EH; Classon E; Larsby B; Arlinger S; Lunner T; Rudner M; Rönnberg J
    Trends Hear; 2014 Nov; 18():. PubMed ID: 25421088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Measuring Auditory Fitness in Locomotive Engineers: Development and Validation of a Signal Detection Test.
    van der Hoek-Snieders HEM; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1313-1320. PubMed ID: 33883426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Acute Alcohol Intake Deteriorates Hearing Thresholds and Speech Perception in Noise.
    Choi HG; Hong SK; Lee HJ; Chang J
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(4):218-225. PubMed ID: 33341812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
    Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.
    Nilsson M; Soli SD; Sullivan JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1085-99. PubMed ID: 8132902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Speech perception in noise with the "wuerzburg speech test for children"].
    Kraus F; Steigenberger C; Völter C; Hagen R; Shehata-Dieler W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2014 Feb; 93(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 24081653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.
    Plomp R; Mimpen AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Nov; 66(5):1333-42. PubMed ID: 500971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition.
    Hällgren M; Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Apr; 45(4):227-37. PubMed ID: 16684704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Threshold improvement and acoustic gain with hearing aids.
    Walden BE; Kasten RN
    Audiology; 1976; 15(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 938347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Speech recognition and just-follow-conversation tasks for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with different maskers.
    Larsby B; Arlinger S
    Audiology; 1994; 33(3):165-76. PubMed ID: 8042937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of speechreading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise.
    Middelweerd MJ; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Dec; 82(6):2145-7. PubMed ID: 3429736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.