These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6719919)
1. Impact of the brain death ruling in Washington state. Tyler DC; Robertson WO West J Med; 1984 Apr; 140(4):625-7. PubMed ID: 6719919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The status of the permanently unconscious: "You call that living? Gold JA Mercer Law Rev; 1991; 42(3):1087-98. PubMed ID: 11651436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Brain death and the courts. Burkle CM; Schipper AM; Wijdicks EF Neurology; 2011 Mar; 76(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 21357836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification of critically ill patients: a legal examination. Fama AJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1980 Oct; 24(3):514-33. PubMed ID: 11665253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Brain death in a murder victim: a medicolegal dilemma. Lucas BA Hosp Pract; 1987 Apr; 22(4):251+. PubMed ID: 11652505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Karen Quinlan case: problems and proposals. Kennedy IM J Med Ethics; 1976 Mar; 2(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 957371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology. Hyland WF; Baime DS Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The diagnosis of cerebral death in the community hospital. Corbett LP J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1974 Sep; 74(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 11643571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards. Strasser M KY Law J; 1994-1995; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Law at the edge of life: issues of death and dying. Janzen PS Hamline Law Rev; 1984 Jun; 7(2):431-62. PubMed ID: 11649814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. MDs, lawyers probe ethical, legal issues in ending treatment. Bolsen B Am Med News; 1984 Apr; 27(13):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A good death: medical ethics grand rounds. Ram MD; Thompson JS; Kilner JF Hosp Pract; 1986 Apr; 21(4):31-32, 37-38+. PubMed ID: 11652500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Innovative legislative initiatives: the New Jersey Declaration of Death and Advance Directives for Health Care Acts. Armstrong PW; Olick RS Seton Hall Legis J; 1992; 16(1):177-97. PubMed ID: 11653079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The other right-to-life debate: when does Fourteenth Amendment "life" end? Linder DO Ariz Law Rev; 1995; 37(4):1183-207. PubMed ID: 11657292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal trends in bioethics. Davis DS J Clin Ethics; 1997; 8(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 11645024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards a statutory definition of death in Illinois. Jacobson HL; Anderson WC; Speigel HR John Marshall Law Rev; 1981; 14(3):701-15. PubMed ID: 11649714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]