These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6720637)
1. 'Baby Doe' rules. There are alternatives. Johnson DE; Thompson TR; Aroskar M; Cranford RE Am J Dis Child; 1984 Jun; 138(6):523-9. PubMed ID: 6720637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Baby Doe regulations: another view of change. Weil WB Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Apr; 16(2):12-3. PubMed ID: 3700073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The 'Baby Doe' rule. Stevenson DK; Ariagno RL; Kutner JS; Raffin TA; Young EW JAMA; 1986 Apr; 255(14):1909-12. PubMed ID: 3951118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations. Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcry over 'Baby Doe' may revive little-used hospital ethics committee. Wallace C Mod Healthc; 1983 Jun; 13(6):78, 80. PubMed ID: 10260343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Baby Doe rules. Angell M N Engl J Med; 1986 Mar; 314(10):642-4. PubMed ID: 2935736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Baby Doe, Congress and the states: challenging the federal treatment standard for impaired infants. Newman SA Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(1):1-60. PubMed ID: 2764010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternatives to 'Baby Doe' offered. Fox JE US Med; 1983 Nov; 19(22):3, 16-7. PubMed ID: 10264131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Baby Doe regulations: governmental intervention in neonatal rescue medicine. Annas GJ Am J Public Health; 1984 Jun; 74(6):618-20. PubMed ID: 6232863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Baby Doe controversy. N Engl J Med; 1986 Sep; 315(11):707-8. PubMed ID: 3748076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment. Britton JR West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neonatologists and bioethics after Baby Doe. Carter BS J Perinatol; 1993; 13(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 8515309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Withholding treatment from Baby Doe: from discrimination to child abuse. Rhoden NK; Arras JD Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1985; 63(1):18-51. PubMed ID: 3158840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. As I see it: Baby Doe. Jellison MD Trustee; 1984 Jan; 37(1):47. PubMed ID: 10264502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Baby Doe' thrusts administrators into middle of life-death decision. Punch L; Simler SL Mod Healthc; 1982 Jul; 12(7):72-4. PubMed ID: 10317219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 'Baby Doe'--a medical ethical issue. Lang GC West J Med; 1985 Jun; 142(6):837-41. PubMed ID: 4024642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Infant Doe regulations and the absolute requirement to use nourishment and fluids for the dying infant. Paris JJ; Fletcher AB Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 6557313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]