These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6722463)

  • 1. The relationship of background mammographic pattern to hormone dependency in breast cancer.
    Hinton CP; Williams MR; Roebuck EJ; Blamey RW; Glaves J; Nicholson RI; Griffiths K
    Br J Surg; 1984 May; 71(5):357-9. PubMed ID: 6722463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic parenchymal patterns: value as a predictor of hormone dependency and survival in breast cancer.
    Hinton CP; Roebuck EJ; Williams MR; Blamey RW; Glaves J; Nicholson RI; Griffiths K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Jun; 144(6):1103-7. PubMed ID: 3873788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Correlation with mammography and estrogen receptors in breast neoplasms].
    Lorenzetti G; De Rubeis GP
    G Ital Oncol; 1990; 10(1-2):41-6. PubMed ID: 2358309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of estrogen receptors with parenchymal pattern at mammography.
    Ciatto S; Cecchini S; Iossa A; Grazzini G; Messeri G; Valenti L; Nunzi G; Bartolucci R; Di Costanzo F
    Radiology; 1989 Mar; 170(3 Pt 1):695-7. PubMed ID: 2916023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.
    Ziv E; Tice J; Smith-Bindman R; Shepherd J; Cummings S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Dec; 13(12):2090-5. PubMed ID: 15598766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The relationship between the receptor status and the mammographic picture in operable breast cancer].
    Ventrella V; Paradiso A; Farchi G; Tommasi S; Schittulli F; Racanelli A; De Lena M
    Radiol Med; 1990 May; 79(5):483-8. PubMed ID: 2359855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age as a confounding factor in the association of mammographic dysplasia and estrogen receptor concentration in breast cancer.
    Boyd NF; Fishell E; Tonkin K; Mobbs BG
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1987 Oct; 10(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3689983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between mammographic pattern and estrogen receptor content in breast cancer.
    Broberg A; Glas U; Gustafsson SA; Hellström L; Somell A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1983; 3(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 6616077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between mammographic features and hormone receptor content in patients with breast cancer.
    Ainge GR; Choplin RH; Bechtold RE; Muss HB; Case LD; Kute TE
    South Med J; 1989 Dec; 82(12):1506-11. PubMed ID: 2688129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Size, node status and grade of breast tumours: association with mammographic parenchymal patterns.
    Sala E; Solomon L; Warren R; McCann J; Duffy S; Luben R; Day N
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(1):157-61. PubMed ID: 10663736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of hormone responsiveness by mammographic parenchymal pattern in advanced primary breast cancer.
    Nielsen NS; Andersen J; Poulsen HS; Mathiessen O
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1992; 23(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 1463861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of mammographic parenchymal patterns.
    Roebuck EJ
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jun; 55(654):387-98. PubMed ID: 7104565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic parenchymal pattern and breast cancer risk: a critical appraisal of the evidence.
    Goodwin PJ; Boyd NF
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jun; 127(6):1097-108. PubMed ID: 3285665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Steroid-hormone receptors in breast cancer.
    Wittliff JL
    Cancer; 1984 Feb; 53(3 Suppl):630-43. PubMed ID: 6692266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the oestrogen receptor concentration of a breast cancer change during systemic therapy?
    Hawkins RA; Tesdale AL; Anderson ED; Levack PA; Chetty U; Forrest AP
    Br J Cancer; 1990 Jun; 61(6):877-80. PubMed ID: 2372489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical predictive criteria for response to endocrine treatment and the receptor status.
    Maass H; Jonat W
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1980; 71():26-9. PubMed ID: 7378140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response to endocrine manipulation and oestrogen receptor concentration in large operable primary breast cancer.
    Anderson ED; Forrest AP; Levack PA; Chetty U; Hawkins RA
    Br J Cancer; 1989 Aug; 60(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 2527549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
    Horwitz RI; Lamas AM; Peck D
    Am J Med; 1984 Oct; 77(4):621-4. PubMed ID: 6486138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer: reliability of mammographic appearance as a predictor of hormone receptor status.
    Ciatto S; Morrone D; Catarzi S; Bonardi R
    Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):805-8. PubMed ID: 1311118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Background parenchymal enhancement on breast MRI and mammographic breast density: correlation with tumour characteristics.
    Kim MY; Choi N; Yang JH; Yoo YB; Park KS
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Jul; 70(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 25824280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.