These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6723624)

  • 21. The complex role of perceptual organization in visual display design theory.
    Sanderson PM; Haskell I; Flach JM
    Ergonomics; 1992 Oct; 35(10):1199-219. PubMed ID: 1516576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The orthographic uniqueness point and eye movements during reading.
    Miller B; Juhasz BJ; Rayner K
    Br J Psychol; 2006 May; 97(Pt 2):191-216. PubMed ID: 16613649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The working adaptation in visual display terminal (VDT) workers].
    Kurimoto S; Noro K; Matsuoka S; Yamamoto S; Komatsubara A; Iwasaki T
    J UOEH; 1986 Mar; 8 Suppl():227-64. PubMed ID: 3726305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
    Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Set-shifting and the on-line processing of relative clauses in Parkinson's disease: results from a novel eye-tracking method.
    Hochstadt J
    Cortex; 2009 Sep; 45(8):991-1011. PubMed ID: 19473654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Display-control compatibility: the relationship between performance and judgments of performance.
    Tlauka M
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 14668162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developmental eye movement test: what is it really measuring?
    Ayton LN; Abel LA; Fricke TR; McBrien NA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Jun; 86(6):722-30. PubMed ID: 19417709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm.
    Häikiö T; Bertram R; Hyönä J; Niemi P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Feb; 102(2):167-81. PubMed ID: 18538339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [A comparison of Chinese reading parameters among rapid serial visual presentation, full screen and printed displays].
    Wang CX; Lü F; Xu D; Chen J; Xie RZ; Zhu L; Qu J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 43(8):704-8. PubMed ID: 18001567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. After-effects of TFT-LCD display polarity and display colour on the detection of low-contrast objects.
    Mayr S; Buchner A
    Ergonomics; 2010 Jul; 53(7):914-25. PubMed ID: 20582772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A study of VDU operators' information processing based on saccadic eye movement and response time.
    Yamamoto S
    Ergonomics; 1985 Jun; 28(6):855-67. PubMed ID: 4029111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A framework for unpacking cognitive benefits of distributed complex visual displays.
    Jang J; Schunn CD
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Sep; 20(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 24933429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Image quality determines differences in reading performance and perceived image quality with CRT and hard-copy displays.
    Jorna GC; Snyder HL
    Hum Factors; 1991 Aug; 33(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 1955204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Human performance with homogeneous, patterned, and random alphanumeric displays.
    Hull AJ
    Ergonomics; 1976 Nov; 19(6):741-50. PubMed ID: 1009920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Eye movement measurement of readability of CRT displays.
    Kolers PA; Duchnicky RL; Ferguson DC
    Hum Factors; 1981 Oct; 23(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 7319497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Keeping track of sequential events: implications for the design of displays.
    Monty RA
    Ergonomics; 1973 Jul; 16(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 4757410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of glare on performance of a VDT reading-comprehension task.
    Garcia KD; Wierwille WW
    Hum Factors; 1985 Apr; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 4018809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reading is slower from CRT displays than from paper: attempts to isolate a single-variable explanation.
    Gould JD; Alfaro L; Barnes V; Finn R; Grischkowsky N; Minuto A
    Hum Factors; 1987 Jun; 29(3):269-99. PubMed ID: 3623564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Readability of dials at different distances with constant visual angle.
    Chapanis A; Scarpa LC
    Hum Factors; 1967 Oct; 9(5):419-26. PubMed ID: 5582456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Human operator response speed, frequency, and flexibility: a review and analysis.
    Wargo MJ
    Hum Factors; 1967 Jun; 9(3):221-38. PubMed ID: 4863205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.