These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6723669)

  • 1. Validity in diagnosing osteoporosis. Observer variation in interpreting spinal radiographs.
    Jensen GF; McNair P; Boesen J; Hegedüs V
    Eur J Radiol; 1984 Feb; 4(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 6723669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision in assessment of osteoporosis from spine radiographs.
    Herss Nielsen VA; Pødenphant J; Martens S; Gotfredsen A; Riis BJ
    Eur J Radiol; 1991; 13(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 1889422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Observer variation in the detection of osteopenia.
    Epstein DM; Dalinka MK; Kaplan FS; Aronchick JM; Marinelli DL; Kundel HL
    Skeletal Radiol; 1986; 15(5):347-9. PubMed ID: 3738537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of lumbosacral spine radiograph reading by chiropractors, chiropractic radiologists, and medical radiologists.
    de Zoete A; Assendelft WJ; Algra PR; Oberman WR; Vanderschueren GM; Bezemer PD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Sep; 27(17):1926-33; discussion 1933. PubMed ID: 12221360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consistency between physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists and a radiologist in interpretation of lumbosacral radiographs.
    Taskaynatan MA; Kızılırmak S; Balaban B; Bozlar U; Goktepe AS; Ozgul A; Tan AK
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2011; 24(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 22142707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reproducibility of the mandibular cortical index.
    Jowitt N; MacFarlane T; Devlin H; Klemetti E; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 10740467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Spinal biphotonic absorptiometry].
    Sabatier JP; Guaydier-Souquières G; Courthéoux F; Rivaton F; Loyau G
    Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic; 1985 Dec; 52(12):685-8. PubMed ID: 4095472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic morphometry and osteopenia in spinal osteoporosis.
    Aloia JF; Vaswani A; Atkins H; Zanzi I; Ellis K; Cohn SH
    J Nucl Med; 1977 May; 18(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 404401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-observer variation in the interpretation of chest radiographs for pneumonia in community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.
    Hopstaken RM; Witbraad T; van Engelshoven JM; Dinant GJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 Aug; 59(8):743-52. PubMed ID: 15262550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observer variation in MRI for suspected scaphoid fractures.
    Beeres FJ; Hogervorst M; Kingma LM; Le Cessie S; Coerkamp EG; Rhemrev SJ
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 81(972):950-4. PubMed ID: 18762479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observer variation in detecting lymphadenopathy on chest radiography.
    Du Toit G; Swingler G; Iloni K
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2002 Sep; 6(9):814-7. PubMed ID: 12234137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [X-ray substance analysis of bone. Principle and practical application].
    Krokowski E
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1968 Mar; 108(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 5693118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Observer variation in interpreting radiographs of the pituitary fossa.
    McLachlan MS; Banna M
    Invest Radiol; 1979; 14(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 478791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An assessment of inter-observer agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographs.
    Tudor GR; Finlay D; Taub N
    Clin Radiol; 1997 Mar; 52(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 9091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex difference in the validity of vertebral deformities as an index of prevalent vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a population survey of older men and women.
    Leidig-Bruckner G; Limberg B; Felsenberg D; Bruckner T; Holder S; Kather A; Miksch J; Wüster C; Ziegler R; Scheidt-Nave C
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(2):102-19. PubMed ID: 10793868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reliability of the radiographic diagnosis of osteoporosis. Individual differences between observers assessing the spinal column for osteoporotic fractures].
    Jensen GF; McNair P; Boesen J; Hegedüs V
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1983 Jun; 145(23):1766-8. PubMed ID: 6879808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Vertebral algodystrophy: myth or reality?].
    Cayla J; Rondier J
    Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic; 1982 Nov; 49(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 7156832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.
    Genant HK; Jergas M; Palermo L; Nevitt M; Valentin RS; Black D; Cummings SR
    J Bone Miner Res; 1996 Jul; 11(7):984-96. PubMed ID: 8797120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comments on 3 cases of osseous bridge between the transverse apophysis and the lumbar spine].
    Palou RT; Roldós EA; Santamaría A; Barceló P
    Rev Esp Reum Enferm Osteoartic; 1970 Apr; 13(6):343-8. PubMed ID: 5480530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.