These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 6724175)

  • 1. Hearing aid evaluation based on measures of benefit, use, and satisfaction.
    Oja GL; Schow RL
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 6724175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hearing aid prescription rules using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G; Backelin L
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 6523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) as a hearing aid outcome measure.
    Surr RK; Kolb JA; Cord MT; Garrus NP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Oct; 10(9):489-95. PubMed ID: 10522622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors which affect measures of speech audibility with hearing aids.
    Popelka GR; Mason DI
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):109S-118S. PubMed ID: 3678649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids.
    Silman S; Gelfand SA; Silverman CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1357-62. PubMed ID: 6512097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The benefit of hearing aids: influence of hearing loss and age.
    Welzl-Müller K; Stephan K
    Scand Audiol; 1986; 15(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 3749780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frequency-compression outcomes in listeners with steeply sloping audiograms.
    Simpson A; Hersbach AA; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Nov; 45(11):619-29. PubMed ID: 17118905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
    Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Listener-assessed intelligibility of a hearing aid self-adaptive noise filter.
    Stein LK; Dempesy-Hart D
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 6468777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hearing-aid outcome measured following one month of hearing aid use by the elderly.
    Humes LE; Garner CB; Wilson DL; Barlow NN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):469-86. PubMed ID: 11407554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Syllable-constituent perception by hearing-aid users: Common factors in quiet and noise.
    Miller JD; Watson CS; Leek MR; Dubno JR; Wark DJ; Souza PE; Gordon-Salant S; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2933. PubMed ID: 28464618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study.
    Takahashi G; Martinez CD; Beamer S; Bridges J; Noffsinger D; Sugiura K; Bratt GW; Williams DW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Apr; 18(4):323-49. PubMed ID: 17580727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech spectrum considerations and speech intelligibility predictions in hearing aid evaluations.
    Pavlovic CV
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1989 Feb; 54(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2915524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual consequence of vents in hearing aids.
    Kuk FK
    Br J Audiol; 1991 Jun; 25(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 1873583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.